Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Robert D. Ring
E1999-02088-CCA-R3-CD
After pleading guilty to vehicular homicide by intoxication, a Class B felony, the trial court ordered the defendant to serve his eight-year sentence on intensive probation, in-house arrest circumstances, subject further to the following conditions: (a) zero use of alcohol; (b) not own or drive an automobile; (c) alcohol counseling after evaluation; (d) payment of liquidated restitution to the victim's family within twenty-four (24) months; (e) any other conditions deemed prudent after intake of the Probation Department. The State appeals and asserts that the trial court erred in placing this defendant on probation because the trial court failed to consider the victim's impact testimony at the sentencing hearing. We agree that the trial court misapplied the applicable law characterizing the victim's impact testimony as a "victim's impact statement" and unduly limited the consideration of such statement to enhancing and mitigating factors. However, after de novo review of the record, we affirm the trial court's judgment, after considering all evidence presented, including the victim's impact testimony, concluding that the factors favoring an alternative sentence, specifically intensive probation, clearly outweigh any factors favoring incarceration.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| State vs. Marilyn Skaggs
M1999-00428-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of aggravated burglary, one count of theft, and three counts of forgery. The Defendant was sentenced to serve sixty days in jail followed by six years of supervised probation. Subsequently, the Defendant's probation officer alleged that the Defendant violated the terms of her probation for numerous reasons. Following a hearing, the Defendant's probation was revoked. The Defendant now argues the following: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting as an exhibit a computer printout of summary notes, (2) that the trial court erred in admitting as an exhibit a faxed copy of an affidavit in lieu of the actual affidavit, and (3) that the court erred in revoking the Defendant's probation. After a review of the record and applicable law, we find no merit to the Defendant's contentions and thus affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Stella L. Hargrove |
Wayne County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| State vs. Greg Hartman
E2000-00685-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant was convicted by a Rhea County jury of attempt to commit kidnapping. The Defendant now appeals arguing that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to convict him of attempt to commit kidnapping. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Rhea County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| State vs. Susan Blackburn
M1999-00295-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Susan Blackburn, was charged with driving under the influence of an intoxicant and driving with a blood alcohol content of .10 percent or more. She was subsequently tried by jury in Williamson County and found guilty of third-offense driving under the influence. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred by overruling her motion for mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct, by improperly instructing the jury concerning the Defendant's level of blood alcohol concentration, by allowing the prosecutor to make improper remarks during closing arguments, and by improperly denying the Defendant's motion to suppress the results of her blood tests. We hold that the trial court properly overruled the Defendant's motion for mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct, that the trial court properly instructed the jury with regard to the Defendant's blood alcohol concentration, that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling the Defendant's objection to remarks made during closing arguments, and that the trial court did not err by overruling the Defendant's motion to suppress the results of her blood tests. Accordingly, we affirm the Defendant's conviction.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| State vs. Matthew Johnston
E1999-00496-CCA-R3-CD
A Roane County jury convicted the Defendant of theft of an automobile valued at greater than $1,000.00, a Class D felony. He now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of unauthorized use of an automobile. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the requested lesser-included offense but that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Carlos Mcdonald
W1999-01459-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/24/00 | |
| State vs. Timothy Higgs
W1999-01534-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from a jury trial conviction for possession of contraband in a penal institution, a Class C felony. In this appeal, the defendant alleges the evidence was not sufficient to support his conviction. Concluding that the evidence was sufficient, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Weakley County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/24/00 | |
| State vs. Shannon Prier
W1999-01436-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals her conviction for theft over $1,000 for which she received a two-year suspended sentence. The defendant comes before this court raising the following issues: 1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support her conviction; and 2) whether the trial court properly denied her petition for judicial diversion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Lauderdale County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/24/00 | |
| State vs. Eddie Taylor
W1999-01803-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Roy B. Morgan, Jr. |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/24/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. James Admeral Yandal
W2002-01521-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/21/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Arnold L. Jones
II-1-98-353
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Jere Joseph
W1999-00651-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Jere Lowell Joseph, Jr., appeals two post-conviction cases, claiming that the trial court erred in holding that the petitioner received the effective assistance of counsel in both cases. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:J. Steven Stafford |
Dyer County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Jeffery Leon Medley
M1998-00439-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Jeffrey Leon Medley, appeals his sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration imposed by the Warren County Circuit Court pursuant to the appellant's conviction of improper influence of a juror. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we dismiss this appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. James E. Mathis
II-1098-328-C
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Wayne Joseph Burgess, Jr.
M1999-02040-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Wayne Joseph Burgess, Jr., was convicted by a jury in the Giles County Circuit Court of one count of first degree felony murder, with the underlying felony being aggravated child abuse. The trial court sentenced the appellant to life in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The appellant raises the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred in overruling the appellant's motion to strike the jury panel because the appellant's race was substantially under- represented on the venire from which the petit jury was selected under a practice providing "the opportunity for discrimination;" (2) whether the trial court erred in overruling the appellant's motion to suppress a confession that was obtained by the use of intimidation, threat, and coercion by the Pulaski Police Department; (3) whether the trial court erred in overruling the appellant's objection to allowing the prior inconsistent statement of Rickey Sikes to be entered into the record as substantive evidence; (4) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the appellant's conviction of first degree murder in the perpetration of aggravated child abuse as the State failed to prove the requisite mental status of "knowing" to commit that offense. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Giles County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| Thomas W. Yelton vs. State
M1999-00597-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Thomas W. Yelton, appeals the denial by the Bedford County Circuit Court of his petition for post-conviction relief from his 1992 convictions of fabricating evidence, theft of property worth more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), coercion of a witness, and harassment. Specifically, he alleges that he is entitled to relief from his convictions because he received ineffective assistance of counsel during trial proceedings. The petitioner predicates his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel upon the following grounds: (1) trial counsel failed to submit to the trial court a motion requesting the severance of his offenses; (2) trial counsel maintained inadequate contact with the petitioner during trial proceedings; (3) trial counsel failed to adequately investigate his case; and (4) trial counsel failed to adequately advise the petitioner concerning the waiver of his right to appeal his convictions. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:William Charles Lee |
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| Travis Plummer vs. State
M1999-01406-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Travis Plummer, was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court of Davidson County of one count of rape of a child, and subsequently also pled guilty to one count of rape. The trial court sentenced the petitioner to twenty years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for rape of a child and to twelve years incarceration for rape. The trial court further ordered that the petitioner's sentences be served consecutively. In this post conviction proceeding, the petitioner raises the following issue(s) for review: whether the petitioner was denied his constitutional rights at trial and at the plea proceeding when his counsel(s) failed to investigate and evaluate his competency to stand trial and to plead guilty. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Barry Speck
W1999-00436-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Barry L. Speck, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The state contends that the petition should have been dismissed because of the statute of limitations. The petitioner contends that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to use documents provided by the petitioner to impeach the state's witnesses and to provide an alibi for dates listed in the bill of particulars. We hold that the petition was properly considered on its merits, but we affirm the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:John P. Colton, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Barry Waters Rogers
M1999-01389-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Barry Waters Rogers, appeals his conviction by a jury in the Giles County Circuit Court of driving under the influence of an intoxicant. On appeal, the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the underlying indictment. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Robert L. Jones |
Giles County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. James Eric Alder
M1999-02544-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, James Eric Alder, was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court for Sequatchie County of one count of aggravated robbery, a class B felony. The trial court sentenced the appellant, as a Range I offender, to ten years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction and assessed a fine of $25,000. The appellant raises the following issue(s) for review: whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury as to aggravated assault, assault, and theft as lesser-included offenses of aggravated robbery. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Sequatchie County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Michael N. Grey
M1999-01428-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Michael N. Grey, was convicted by a jury in the Dickson County Circuit Court of two counts of aggravated robbery, a class B felony, and two counts of theft under $500, a class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced the appellant to ten years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for the aggravated robbery convictions. The trial court also sentenced the appellant to eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration in the Dickson County Jail for the theft convictions.The trial court further ordered that the appellant's sentences be served concurrently. The appellant raises the following issue for review: whether the appellant was denied due process because the State failed to provide him with proper pre-trial exculpatory evidence. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Allen W. Wallace |
Dickson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| State vs. Christina L. Howard
M1999-02473-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant Christina L. Howard was found guilty by a Williamson County jury of possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine in an amount greater than 300 grams, possession with intent to sell or deliver marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Defendant as a Range I standard offender to concurrent terms of twenty years for cocaine possession, one year for marijuana possession, and one day for possession of drug paraphernalia. Defendant raises the following issues in this appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred when it did not instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of facilitation of a felony; (2) whether the trial court erred when it sentenced Defendant as a standard offender; and (3) whether the trial court erred when it denied Defendant alternative sentencing. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Henry D. Bell |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/19/00 | |
| William Andrew Dixon vs. Flora J. Holland, Warden
M1999-02494-CCA-R3-PC
William Andrew Dixon was convicted of kidnapping for ransom in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-2603 in April 1981 in the Circuit Court of Dickson County. The offense was committed in April 1978. Between the time of the offense in 1978, and the time of trial in 1981, kidnapping for ransom was redesignated by the legislature as the offense of aggravated kidnapping; the maximum punishment was reduced by the legislature from life imprisonment without parole to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. The Tennessee Department of Correction maintains that it is incarcerating Petitioner under a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Criminal Court of Davidson County, asserting the judgment is illegal and void. The petition was denied. The judgment is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/18/00 | |
| Henry Eugene Hodges vs. State
M1999-00516-CCA-R3-PD
The appellant, Henry Eugene Hodges, seeks post-conviction relief from his 1992 first degree murder conviction and sentence of death. The Davidson County Criminal Court denied the appellant's petition and this appeal was taken. This court is presented with the following issues: (1) the effectiveness of trial counsel; (2) the post-conviction court's failure to provide funds for expert services; and (3) the post-conviction court's denial of a continuance and refusal to bifurcate the post-conviction evidentiary hearing. Following review of the record, we conclude (1) the appellant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel; (2) the post-conviction court properly denied the appellant's request for funds for additional expert services; and (3) the post-conviction court properly denied the appellant's request for a continuance of the evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, we affirm the post-conviction court's finding that the appellant is not entitled to post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/18/00 | |
| Robert B. Clark v. State of Tennessee
W2007-01440-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Lee V. Coffee |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/18/00 |