Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Selina Harrelson
W1999-00521-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Selina G. Harrelson, was convicted of possession of one-half gram or more of cocaine with intent to sell. She contends that the officer did not have probable cause to search the truck with the drug detection dog; that the evidence is insufficient to show that she possessed crack cocaine; and that the trial court should have imposed a sentence alternative to incarceration. We hold that the defendant lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy in the truck to contest the search and that, in any event, the officer had probable cause. We hold that the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court properly sentenced the defendant to incarceration. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Robin Vanhoose
W1999-00708-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted by a Hardin County jury of aggravated assault and received an eight-year sentence as a Range II multiple offender. He now appeals his conviction alleging (1) the indictment does not state an offense; and (2) the evidence is insufficient to support aggravated assault. We conclude the indictment adequately informed the defendant of the offense charged, and the evidence presented at trial was sufficient for the jury to conclude he was guilty of aggravated assault. Thus, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Hardin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Michael F. Maraschiello
M1997-00049-CCA-R10-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Robert W. Wedemeyer |
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| Rodney Buford vs. State
M1999-00487-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Rodney Buford, is serving an effective sentence of life plus twenty years. His petition for habeas corpus relief was properly dismissed by the trial court because the judgment is not facially invalid and the sentence has not been served.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. John Wayne Gray
M1999-01615-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, John Wayne Gray, appeals as of right from his conviction of the sale of a schedule II controlled substance. On appeal, he argues (1) that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion for acquittal or directed verdict because the State failed to establish circumstances and facts that would provide for a reasonable assurance of the identity of the evidence and because the State failed to establish an unbroken chain of custody; (2) that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the jury verdict; and (3) that the trial court erred in sentencing the Defendant to a mid-range sentence as a Range III offender. We find no error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Christopher Kevin Padgett
M2000-00038-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Leon C. Burns, Jr. |
Putnam County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Daniel Joe James
M1999-1423-CCA-R3-CD
On September 9, 1998, the Defendant, Daniel Joe James, was charged with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The Defendant was convicted by a jury of simple possession of a controlled substance. He received a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days probation and was fined $2,500.00. The Defendant now challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence. On appeal, the State has conceded that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction. After a careful examination of the record, we agree that there is insufficient evidence against the Defendant to support a conviction. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Originating Judge:Buddy D. Perry |
Franklin County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/28/00 | |
| State vs. Daniel Christian Russell
M1999-00202-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Daniel Christian Russell, referred herein as "the defendant," appeals as of right from the judgment of the Wilson County Circuit Court imposing concurrent sentences for aggravated assault and vandalism. The trial court imposed sentences totaling five (5) years to be served concurrently in the Department of Correction. The defendant presents two appellate issues: 1) whether the length of the sentences imposed by the trial court are excessive; and 2) whether the trial court erred by denying the defendant's request for probation. Because the defendant received illegal concurrent sentences, we vacate the judgments of conviction and remand the case for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge L. Terry Lafferty
Originating Judge:J. O. Bond |
Wilson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/27/00 | |
| State vs. Lawrence Sherrill
W1999-01488-CCA-R3-CD
This appeal results from the defendant's conviction by a Carroll County jury for introducing contraband into a penal institution. He was sentenced to six years incarceration and fined $2,500. On appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for a new trial based on the lack of evidence to corroborate the testimony of his accomplice required for a conviction. After careful review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley |
Carroll County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/27/00 | |
| Michael A. Rhodes vs. State
M2000-00369-CCA-R3-PC
This is an appeal arising from the summary dismissal of a petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court's dismissal was based upon the failure to file the petition within the one-year statute of limitations. Upon review of the record, we reverse and remand for further proceedings since the petition was filed within one year of the date of the final action of the Tennessee Supreme Court in the direct appeal.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:James K. Clayton, Jr. |
Rutherford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/27/00 | |
| State vs. Robert Wayman
E1999-02042-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant pled guilty to reckless vehicular homicide, simple possession of marijuana, and sale of a Schedule VI controlled substance. The trial court sentenced the defendant to four years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction (DOC), and the defendant appeals from this sentence, requesting probation. We affirm the sentence of incarceration from the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Loudon County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. Allen Bowers, Jr.
E1999-00882-CCA-R3-CD
A Bledsoe County jury convicted the Defendant of rape of a child, and the trial court sentenced the Defendant to eighteen years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The Defendant now appeals, arguing (1) that his conviction should be reversed because a prospective juror for this case stated in the presence of other prospective jurors that he had been a prospective juror in a previous criminal case in which the Defendant was on trial; (2) that the trial court erred by not ordering a new trial for the Defendant based on a letter that the Defendant's mother received from the victim subsequent to the Defendant's trial in which the victim stated that "nothing happened" between the Defendant and the victim; (3) that the trial court erred by not granting the Defendant a new trial based on evidence presented during the hearing on the Defendant's motion for new trial that a document introduced into evidence at trial as a filed divorce complaint had actually not been filed and contained prejudicial and improper statements about the Defendant; (4) that the State, during its closing argument, improperly mentioned facts not in the record; (5) that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury concerning a "deadlock" in a supplemental instruction; and (6) that the trial court erred by giving the jury the dictionary definition of "captious" and by sending the definition in writing to the jury room without reading it to the jury. After a thorough review of the record, we find no reversible error and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Bledsoe County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. John Clark Garrison
E1999-00121-CCA-R3-CD
On August 3, 1992, the defendant pled guilty to two counts of theft under Tennessee Code Annotated sections 39-14-103, -105(4). The defendant was sentenced to two consecutive nine-year sentences and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $51,000. On June 8, 1999, the defendant filed a Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. It was denied. In this appeal, the defendant contends that 1) the trial court erred in its finding that the defendant's sentence of incarceration and restitution was legal as a matter of law; and 2) the trial court erred by finding that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into a plea agreement involving an illegal sentence. After a careful review, we find no merit in these issues, and find that the defendant's sentence is legal. The defendant's sentence of incarceration and the court's imposition of restitution is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. Gary Anthony Burns
E1999-02610-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Gary Anthony Burns, pleaded guilty to two counts of theft over $500.00. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range I standard offender to two years on each theft count and ordered the sentences to be served concurrently. The trial court then suspended the two-year sentence and ordered the Defendant to be placed on six years probation after service of ninety days in the Sullivan County jail, day for day. The Defendant now appeals, arguing that the trial court unlawfully denied him alternative sentencing. We conclude that the Defendant's sentence is proper and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. Doyle Stevens
E1999-02097-CCA-R3-CD
In July 1999, the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendre on two counts of vehicular homicide and one count of aggravated assault. The defendant contends that the trial court erred by not granting judicial diversion. We conclude that the defendant was not a "qualified defendant" for judicial diversion. His 1992 conviction for driving while under the influence of an intoxicant qualifies as a Class A misdemeanor, and therefore he is not "qualified" for judicial diversion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
|
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. William Blaine Campbell
E1999-02208-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals the sentence imposed for the offense of furnishing alcohol to a minor. The defendant contends that he should have been granted judicial diversion and full probation. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. Ralph Dewayne Moore
E1999-02743-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| Joseph Lebron Derrick vs. State
E1999-02646-CCA-R3-PC
The Defendant was convicted by a Hamilton County jury of second degree murder and was sentenced to twenty-years incarceration. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed his conviction and sentence, and the Tennessee Supreme Court denied permission to appeal. The Defendant subsequently filed a post-conviction petition, alleging that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel and his right to a fair trial. The post-conviction court denied post-conviction relief. We conclude that the Defendant was denied neither his right to effective assistance of counsel at trial nor his right to a fair trial. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of trial court denying post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Stephen M. Bevil |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. Robert Bentley Miller
E1999-00970-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty as a Range II multiple offender to two counts of facilitation of the sale of a Schedule IV drug (a Class E felony) and three counts of facilitation of the sale of a Schedule VI drug (a Class A misdemeanor). The Defendant received sentences of three years for each of the felonies and eleven months, twenty-nine days for each of the misdemeanors. All five sentences were to be served concurrently, for an effective sentence of three years. The manner of service of the sentence was not part of the plea agreement but was to be decided by the trial court after a sentencing hearing. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court determined that the sentence should be served in the Department of Correction. In this appeal, the Defendant argues that he was wrongfully denied probation or alternative sentencing. Finding no merit to the Defendant's argument, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:R. Jerry Beck |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/26/00 | |
| State vs. Matthew Johnston
E1999-00496-CCA-R3-CD
A Roane County jury convicted the Defendant of theft of an automobile valued at greater than $1,000.00, a Class D felony. He now appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of unauthorized use of an automobile. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the requested lesser-included offense but that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| Jack P. Carr vs. David Mills, Warden
E2000-00156-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner sought writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he was entitled to relief because the judgments of conviction were not signed by the trial judge. We hold unsigned judgments do not render judgments void, such as entitles a defendant to habeas corpus relief. We affirm the trial court's dismissal.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Morgan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| State vs. Billy Joe Phillips,a.k.a. Billy Joe West, a.k.a Joseph L. Phillips
E1999-00542-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted by a jury of one count of driving while his driver's license was revoked, one count of criminal impersonation, and was found guilty of violating the implied consent law. The defendant claims there was insufficient evidence introduced to support his convictions. After a careful review, we affirm the defendant's conviction of criminal impersonation and reverse and dismiss the defendant's conviction for driving on a revoked driver's license.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Morgan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| Daylon Demetric Roberts vs. State
E1999-02180-CCA-R3-PC
The Defendant was convicted of murder perpetrated in an attempt to commit a robbery. His conviction was affirmed on appeal to this Court, and the Tennessee Supreme Court denied permission to appeal. The Defendant subsequently filed a petition for post-conviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the petition. The Defendant now appeals the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief, arguing that conflicts with his attorneys prevented the attorneys from providing him effective assistance of counsel at trial and that the trial court forced him to proceed to trial despite those conflicts. Finding no error in the record before us, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| Morgan Lewis Ray vs. State
M1999-00531-CCA-R3-CD
Morgan Lewis Ray appeals his conviction by a jury in the Bedford County Circuit Court of one count of driving under the influence, fifth offense, a class A misdemeanor, and one count of driving on a revoked license, second or subsequent offense, a class A misdemeanor. The trial court imposed a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration in the Bedford County Jail for driving under the influence, requiring service of one hundred percent of the sentence. The trial court also imposed a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration for driving on a revoked license, requiring service of seventy-five percent of the sentence. On appeal, the appellant presents the following issue for review: whether the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to support both convictions. Following a review of the record and parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
|
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 | |
| Morgan Lewis Ray vs. State
M1999-00531-CCA-R3-CD
Morgan Lewis Ray appeals his conviction by a jury in the Bedford County Circuit Court of one count of driving under the influence, fifth offense, a class A misdemeanor, and one count of driving on a revoked license, second or subsequent offense, a class A misdemeanor. The trial court imposed a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration in the Bedford County Jail for driving under the influence, requiring service of one hundred percent of the sentence. The trial court also imposed a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days incarceration for driving on a revoked license, requiring service of seventy-five percent of the sentence. On appeal, the appellant presents the following issue for review: whether the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to support both convictions. Following a review of the record and parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:W. Charles Lee |
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/25/00 |