Coastcom, Inc. vs. Cruzen, et.ux.
01A01-9707-CH-00349
Originating Judge:H. Denmark Bell |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 05/29/98 | |
Miller vs. Willbanks
03A01-9709-CV-00411
Originating Judge:John K. Wilson |
Hamblen County | Court of Appeals | 05/28/98 | |
Rubin vs. Rubin
03A01-9711-CV-00502
|
Court of Appeals | 05/28/98 | ||
Haren Construction v. Metro Nashville and Davidson County
M2002-01135-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a contract between the Appellant Haren Construction Company, Inc. (HCCI) and the Appellee Metropolitan Government (Metro). The construction company brought suit claiming Metro breached its contract with HCCI in "constructive suspension" of work. In addition the construction company claimed that Metro interfered with the company's contract for equipment supply from a third party. The trial court granted Metro's two motions for summary judgment, the first concerning Metro's alleged liability under the Governmental Tort Liability Act, the second concerning the action for breach of contract. HCCI appeals the grant of summary judgment. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/28/98 | |
Suntrust Bank vs. Johnson
M1997-00202-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between a commercial bank and the Tennessee Department of Revenue regarding the bank's claim for a refund of the sales taxes paid in connection with defaulted retail installment sales contracts purchased from various automobile dealers. After the Department denied its refund claim, the bank sued the Commissioner of Revenue in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking a refund. Both parties eventually sought a summary judgment. The trial court granted the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment after concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the bank's claim. Alternatively, the trial court held that the bank was not entitled to the requested refund because it was not the dealer who originally remitted the sales tax to the Department. We have determined that the trial court erred by determining that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the bank's refund claim. However, we have also determined that the trial court correctly concluded that the bank was not entitled to the requested refund because it was not the dealer who remitted the sales tax at issue.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Ernest B. Pellegrin |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/26/98 | |
Davis v. Erwin
03A01-9707-CV-00247
|
Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | ||
Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. Mangrum
01A01-9709-JV-00530
Originating Judge:Andrew J. Shookhoff |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | |
Simmons vs. Russell, et. al.
01A01-9709-CV-00467
Originating Judge:James E. Walton |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | |
Forbes vs. Wilson Co. Emergency
01A01-9602-CH-00089
Originating Judge:C. K. Smith |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | |
Lawson vs. Lawson
03A01-9709-CH-00406
|
Claiborne County | Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | |
Perkins vs. Kirby
03A01-9709-CH-00429
|
Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | ||
Crittenden vs. Crittenden
03A01-9709-CH-00407
|
Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | ||
Shahrdar vs. Global Housing, Inc.
01A01-9710-CV-00553
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/20/98 | |
Dempsey vs. International
03A01-9709-CV-00436
|
Court of Appeals | 05/19/98 | ||
Wakefield vs. Crawley
03A01-9707-CH-00290
|
Court of Appeals | 05/19/98 | ||
Helm vs. Hayes
03A01-9710-PB-00497
|
Court of Appeals | 05/19/98 | ||
Oates vs. Glenstone
03A01-9712-CV-00545
|
Court of Appeals | 05/19/98 | ||
Bettye/Louis Schopfer vs. Kroger
02A01-9707-CV-00138
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/18/98 | |
Don/Phil Gordon vs. Georgetown Univ
02A01-9709-CH-00218
Originating Judge:William Michael Maloan |
Weakley County | Court of Appeals | 05/15/98 | |
Edwin B. Raskin Co. vs. Johnson
01A01-9708-CH-00392
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/15/98 | |
Randall Fleming vs. Jacqueline Yi
02A01-9706-CV-00129
Originating Judge:Whit A. Lafon |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 05/15/98 | |
In re: Brittany Swanson, a minor
02A01-9709-CV-00233
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 05/14/98 | |
Mary Fuller vs. Eligo Fuller
02A01-9708-CH-00175
Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 05/13/98 | |
Tanaka vs. Meares
03A01-9710-CV-00463
Originating Judge:Dick Jerman, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 05/12/98 | |
Judy Plunk, who sues as Administratrix of the Estate of Jerry L. Plunk v. Illinois Railroad a Corporation - Concurring
02A01-9707-CV-00167
Judy Plunk (“plaintiff”) as administratrix of her husband’s estate, filed suit in the Circuit Court of Shelby County pursuant to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, (FELA) against the Illinois Central Railroad (“defendant” or “railroad”) seeking damages stemming from the death of her husband, Jerry Plunk (“decedent”), who was the engineer of a train owned and operated by defendant that was involved in a head-on collision with another train. The case was tried by a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proof and again at the conclusion of all the proof, defendant made a motion for a directed verdict which was overruled each time by the trial court. The case was submitted to the jury, who found plaintiff’s decedent 70% negligent and defendant 30% negligent in causing the collision, and awarded plaintiff $285,000.00 as damages. On appeal defendant has raised five issues for our consideration: whether the trial court erred in (1) failing to grant defendant’s motion for directed verdict on the ground that decedent was the sole cause of the accident; (2) admitting into evidence testimony of plaintiff’s expert, Dennis Runcie; (3) allowing other railroad employees to testify as “experts” regarding “good railroad practice”; (4) admitting into evidence testimony of plaintiff’s economist expert, Fred Johnson; and (5) failing to order plaintiff’s counsel to dismiss with prejudice allegations of defendant’s vicarious liability in two collateral cases pending in Mississippi and to cease representation of certain plaintiffs in the Mississippi litigation. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we reverse in part and remand this case to the trial court for a new trial in keeping with the provisions of this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Hewitt Tomlin
Originating Judge:Judge John R. Mccarroll, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/08/98 |