| Linda Parnham vs. Wayne Parnham
M1998-00915-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves the continuing obligation of a non-custodial parent to pay child support following a discharge in bankruptcy. The custodial spouse filed a petition in the Circuit Court for Davidson County seeking to enforce the modified child support provision in their marital dissolution agreement. The non-custodial parent responded that his discharge in bankruptcy relieved him of any further obligation to pay this support. Following a hearing, the trial court held that the non-custodial spouse's Chapter 7 bankruptcy did not discharge his child support obligation but denied the custodial spouse's requests for attorney's fees and for a wage assignment. Both parties have appealed. We have determined that the trial court properly concluded that the non-custodial spouse's child support obligation had not been discharged but that the trial court erred by declining to award the custodial spouse her attorney's fees and by refusing to grant her request for a wage assignment.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Ginger Vooys vs. Robert Turner, Jr.
M1999-00504-COA-R3-CV
The sole issue presented in this appeal is the propriety of the trial court's award to Wife of postjudgment interest on funds Husband deposited in the office of the clerk of the trial court prior to the appeal of the final order divorcing the parties. The funds represent the purchase price of the marital residence which had been awarded to Wife. Exercising an option to purchase the house, Husband deposited $185,000 with the court clerk and tendered it in open court. Then Husband appealed various portions of the final order, including the award of the house to Wife; he also moved to stay the execution and enforcement of that and other portions of the judgment without paying a bond on the ground that the funds he had already deposited should relieve him of the necessity of posting an additional bond. The motion also requested that the funds be placed in an interest bearing account. The stay of execution was granted, but the motion to deposit at interest was never ruled upon. After the trial court's judgment was affirmed on appeal, Wife filed a motion seeking interest on all money judgments rendered against Husband. The trial court found that Wife was entitled to postjudgment interest on the $185,000. Husband then commenced this appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| In re: SJLL
E2000-02461-COA-R3-CV
In paternity action, defendant appeals the Trial Judge's refusal to grant T.R.C.P. Rule 60 relief on the grounds that plaintiff's non-suit was improper, and as a result defendant was denied his right to a jury trial. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Joseph M. Ayers |
Campbell County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Carolyn Attaway vs. Denver Attaway
E2000-01338-COA-R3-CV
In this action to collect child support ordered in the State of Georgia, the Trial Court Ordered the foreign judgment registered in the Circuit Court, allowed a credit for Social Security payments, and denied the defense of statute of limitations. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Jacqueline E. Schulten |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| J.W. Hargrove, et al vs. Larry Carlton, et al
M2000-00250-COA-R3-CV
After the defendant landowners placed gates across a roadway that ran through their land, some adjoining landowners filed suit to have the gates removed. The plaintiffs argued that the roadway was a public road, or in the alternative that they had acquired prescriptive rights to use it. The trial court ruled for the defendants. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| In Re: JJC
E2000-01223-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court terminated the father's parental rights. Father argued below and on appeal, that the part of the UCCJA which gave the court jurisdiction of the matter is unconstitutional. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Arlon Way vs. Jim Hall & The Cumberland County Bd. of Ed.
E2000-01458-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiff was discharged as a teacher for unprofessional conduct, and on appeal to the Trial Court he was reinstated. The Trial Court found the school Board had acted arbitrarily and there was no material evidence to sustain the charge of unprofessional conduct. We reverse and reinstate the Board's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Vernon Neal |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Morristown Firefighters Assoc. vs. City of Morristown, et al
E2000-01942-COA-R3-CV
In July 1999, two vacancies arose within the City of Morristown's fire department ("Fire Department") due to the retirement of a battalion chief and a lieutenant. The Civil Service Act provides the procedure for filling vacancies in Morristown's fire department and requires the City to fill vacancies from a Roster prepared by the Civil Service Board ("Board"). When the two vacancies occurred, the Roster in place had been certified in August 1998, and updated by the Board in November 1998 ("1998 Roster"). The City, however, wanted the Board to prepare a new Roster. The Board did not create a new Roster until September 1999 ("1999 Roster"), and in the meantime, the two positions remained unfilled. The City filled the vacancies from the 1999 Roster. The Morristown Firefighters Association ("Plaintiff") brought suit against the City of Morristown, its mayor and City Council members ("Defendants"), alleging violations of the Civil Service Act for Defendants' failure to fill the vacancies from the 1998 Roster. The Trial Court held in favor of Plaintiff and ordered Defendants to fill the two vacancies from the 1998 Roster. Defendants appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Kindall T. Lawson |
Hamblen County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Package Express Center, Inc. vs. Doug Maund & Emm-Dee Drug Co.
E2000-02059-COA-R3-CV
Package Express Center, Inc. vs. Doug Maund & Emm-Dee Drug Co. ( Concur/Dissent) View
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Deborah Harris vs. Howell Dalton & Medical Associates
E2000-02115-COA-R3-CV
In this action for sexual harassment, the jury returned verdicts for plaintiff. Responding to a motion J.N.O.V., the Trial Judge entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appealed. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:W. Frank Brown, III |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Olympia Child Development Center, Inc. et al vs. City of Maryville
E2000-02124-COA-R3-CV
The suit filed in this tort action originally sought a judgment against the defendant, City of Maryville ("the City"), for damages allegedly sustained by four plaintiffs when a van owned by the plaintiff Olympia Child Development Center, Inc. ("Olympia"), and driven by the plaintiff Lisa K. Murphy was struck by a vehicle driven by Rodney Parton, an off-duty police officer employed by the City. The trial court granted the City summary judgment as to the claims of the remaining plaintiffs, Olympia and Murphy, finding that their claims are barred by the doctrines of collateral estoppel and modified comparative fault. Only Olympia appeals. We affirm the grant of summary judgment, but base our affirmance on a ground other than the one utilized by the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:W. Dale Young |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Larry Wakefield vs. Kimberly Longmire
E2000-01450-COA-R3-CV
This litigation arose out of an accident involving a vehicle owned by Anderson County and being driven at the time of the accident by an employee of the County. The employee sued the driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident. Incident to his original filing, the employee secured service of process on the County's liability insurance carrier, for the purpose of invoking the uninsured motorist coverage of the County's policy. The defendant, Kimberly D. Longmire, filed an answer. She did not seek to impose liability on the employee or the County. Following a jury verdict for the employee in the amount of $641,000, the trial court ruled that the employee's recovery against the uninsured motorist carrier was not capped at $130,000, the limit of the County's liability for an individual claim under the Governmental Tort Liability Act. The carrier, whose policy provided for $1,000,000 of uninsured motorist coverage, appeals, claiming that its obligation under the policy, despite the higher contract limit, is capped at $130,000. The plaintiff contends that the carrier did not appeal from a final order and that its appeal is frivolous. We affirm but do not find the carrier's appeal to be frivolous.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Package Express Center, Inc. vs. Doug Maund & Emm-Dee Drug Co.
E2000-02059-COA-R3-CV
Package Express Center, Inc. vs. Doug Maund & Emm-Dee Drug Co. ( Concur/Dissent) View
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/01 | |
| Judy (Kendrick) Shoemake vs. Timothy Lee Kendrick
E2000-01318-COA-R3-CV
In this appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County the Appellant, Judy (Kendrick) Shoemake questions whether the Trial Court erred in granting a petition to modify custody filed by the Appellee, Timothy Lee Kendrick, and whether the Trial Court erred in its determination of the amount due her for child support arrearage and unreimbursed medical expenses paid by her on behalf of the parties' minor children. We reverse in part, modify in part and remand for further proceedings, if any, consistent with this opinion. We adjudge costs of the appeal against Judy (Kendrick) Shoemake and Timothy Lee Kendrick equally.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:William M. Dender |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/01 | |
| FTA Enterprises, Inc. vs. Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc. & Daniel Cole
E2000-01246-COA-R3-CV
In this action for interference with business relations, interference with contract, breach of fiduciary duty, et., a jury awarded both compensatory and punitive damages in differing amounts against the defendants. The Trial Judge approved the jury verdicts and defendants have appealed. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:John S. Mclellan, III |
Sullivan County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/01 | |
| In Re: Sierra Cheyenne Satterwhite
E2000-02107-COA-R3-CV
The Maternal Grandparents of the Minor Child filed a petition to terminate the biological father's and Mother's parental rights to Minor Child and to adopt her. The Minor Child, who was born out of wedlock, had lived with her Maternal Grandparents all of her life. She viewed her grandparents as her parents. Default judgment was granted against Mother. Father never supported the child and had limited visitation with her. The Trial Court terminated both the biological Father's and Mother's parental right's. Father appealed. We affirm the decision of the Trial Court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:W. Frank Brown, III |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/01 | |
| Harold Lovelace, D/B/A The Last Chance Club, et al vs. City of Knoxville
E2000-01609-COA-R3-CV
In this Declaratory Judgment action the Trial Court held portions of a City Ordinance unconstitutional relative to notice provisions, the term "open for business" and "open display". We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Sharon J. Bell |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/01 | |
| Vesta Mosley vs. Tennessee Water Service & Sales
E2000-01713-COA-R3-CV
In this appeal from the Circuit Court of Anderson County the Defendant/Appellant, Tennessee Water Service and Sales, Inc., appeals the Circuit Court's order which denied Tennessee Water's motion for a new trial and overruled its objection to entry of a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff/ Appellee, Vesta G. Mosley. It is our finding that Tennessee Water did not receive notice of the hearing which resulted in the final judgment against it and, therefore, we vacate such judgment and reverse the Circuit Court's order overruling Tennessee Water's objection to entry of the judgment and its motion for a new trial. We remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/01 | |
| Roy Malone vs. Harleysville Mutual In. Co.
E2000-01308-COA-R3-CV
This matter involves a dispute concerning a fire and casualty insurance policy ("Policy") which covered an apartment complex, Star Chase Apartments. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company ("Defendant") was the insurance carrier, and the named insured was John L. Oliver, LLC ("Oliver"). A fire in one of the apartment buildings caused substantial damage. Approximately six months later, Oliver sold Star Chase to Roy M. Malone, Sr. ("Plaintiff"), prior to starting any repairs to the burned building. Oliver also assigned to Plaintiff his right to the proceeds under the Policy, and Defendant acknowledged this assignment. The Trial Court found that Plaintiff, as Oliver's assignee, was entitled to recover the replacement cost of the burned building, plus prejudgment interest. The Trial Court denied Plaintiff recovery for business loss. Plaintiff appeals the amount awarded to him as the replacement cost and the Trial Court's denial of any additional recovery for business loss. Defendant argues that the assignment of the "proceeds" to Plaintiff did not entitle Plaintiff to recover any amount as replacement cost for repairs done after the assignment. Defendant also objects to the amount of the replacement cost found by the Trial Court and to the awarding of prejudgment interest. We reverse the Trial Court's award of prejudgment interest and affirm all other aspects of the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Howell N. Peoples |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/01 | |
| Barbara Jo Heck, et al v. City of Sevierville
E2000-00464-COA-R3-CV
In this suit the Plaintiffs seek damages for injuries received by Barbara Jo Heck when she slipped on a patch of ice and fell on property owned by the City of Sevierville. The Trial Court found that the City had no actual or constructive notice of the presence of the ice causing Mrs. Heck to fall and, accordingly, dismissed the complaint. We affirm under Rule 10(a) of the Court of Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Judge Rex Henry Ogle |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 02/08/01 | |
| Jerry Trusty, et al., v. Capri Robinson, et al.
M2000-01590-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a landlord-tenant dispute over damage to residential property. After the landlords obtained a $3,600 judgment in the Smith County General Sessions Court, the tenants appealed to the Circuit Court for Smith County. A jury awarded the landlords $4,500. On this appeal, the appellants assert that the trial court erred by (1) permitting the landlords' lawyer to exercise a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatory manner, (2) permitting the landlords' lawyer to make prejudicial statements to the jury during opening argument, (3) providing a supplemental instruction in response to the jury's question, and (4) failing to enter a detailed order denying their motion for new trial. We find nothing deficient in the trial court's order denying the motion for new trial. In addition, the absence of either a transcript or a statement of the evidence or proceedings prevents us from considering the substance of the tenants' other issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and find that the appeal is frivolous.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Clara W. Byrd |
Smith County | Court of Appeals | 02/06/01 | |
| John Hapney, et al., v. James Warren, et al.
E2000-00783-COA-R3-CV
In this case the plaintiffs are seeking damages for personal injuries received in a vehicle accident. The plaintiffs were exiting the interstate and were bumped from the rear by the vehicle driven by Mrs. Warren. While other facts relating to the accident were disputed, it was undisputed that there was no physical injury to either of the vehicles or their contents. The police were not called to the scene and no report was made. The plaintiffs filed suit to collect damages for injuries to Mrs. Hapney's neck which she claimed were received in the accident. The jury found no negligence on the part of the defendants. One of the doctors, who saw Mrs. Hapney, testified for the defendants in the case as to causation of Mrs. Hapney's injuries. In their motion for a new trial and on appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of the doctor. The trial court denied the motion for a new trial. The plaintiffs appeal challenging the jury verdict and the admission of the doctor's testimony. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Judge O. Duane Slone |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 02/06/01 | |
| Bradley J. Brown v. Mickey Joe Rogers
M2000-01277-COA-R3-CV
The biological father appeals the termination of his parental rights which allowed the adoption of his two children by the stepfather after the mother's death. Although the evidence that the father abandoned his children was clear and convincing, the proof, when supplemented with post-judgment facts, was insufficient to determine whether termination of parental rights was in the best interests of the children. We remand for a hearing on the children's best interests.
Authoring Judge: Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Judge Don R. Ash |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 02/05/01 | |
| Ronald L. Davis v. Donal Campbell
M1997-00234-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between a prisoner serving a 99-year sentence and the Department of Correction regarding the calculation of the prisoner's release eligibility date. After the Department declined to issue a declaratory order changing his release eligibility date, the prisoner filed an action in the Chancery Court for Davidson County asserting that the Department had incorrectly classified him as a Class X felon because he had not been convicted of a Class X crime, and he had not received credit for jail time served prior to his prison sentence. The Commissioner of Correction moved to dismiss the complaint, and the trial court, after converting the Commissioner's motion to a motion for summary judgment, dismissed the prisoner's complaint. On this appeal, the prisoner essentially reargues the same issues raised in his complaint. We have determined that the trial court correctly concluded that the material facts are not in dispute and that the Commissioner is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/05/01 | |
| State of Tennessee, ex Rel. Elisa Crippen, v. Lawrence Johnson
E1999-01855-COA-R3-CV
This case concerns the modification of a child support award. In addition to the child for whom support was set in the instant case, the obligor father had three other children. At one point in the past, he was required by court order to support these three other children; but, by the time of the hearing below, his obligation had been terminated except for an arrearage on which he was continuing to pay. In determining the proper award in the instant case, the trial court considered the father's other three children and deviated from the Child Support Guidelines due to the father's "hardship." The State, as assignee of the mother's right to child support, appeals. We modify the trial court's award.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Carey E. Garrett |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/02/01 |
APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS
Please enter some keywords to search.