Please enter some keywords to search.
| Herman Howard. v. American Industries Services
M2001-02711-COA-R3-CV
The Chancery Court of Davidson County dismissed the complaint in this case for the plaintiffs' failure to respond to discovery requests. The plaintiffs assert on appeal that the chancellor abused her discretion. We affirm the chancery court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Pigeon Forge vs. William Loveday
E2002-00643-COA-R3-CV
Landowner seeks a new trial in eminent domain case on grounds that the Trial Court admitted in evidence the price paid for the land 19 years earlier. We reverse the Trial Court's Judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Teresa Malone vs. Shane Maddox
E2002-01403-COA-R3-CV
This case focuses on an insurance company's liability under the uninsured motorist ("UM") provisions of an automobile insurance policy. It arises out of an automobile accident involving Teresa Malone ("the policyholder") and Shane Maddox ("the uninsured motorist"). The policyholder appeals the trial court's judgment decreeing that the policyholder's uninsured motorist carrier, Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company ("the UM carrier"), cannot be held liable for prejudgment interest under the facts of this case because such an award would cause the total judgment against the UM carrier to exceed the UM coverage limit in the policy. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:W. Neil Thomas, III |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| James Staggs v. Lori Staggs
M2001-01192-COA-R3-CV
The trial court transferred custody of the parties' two children from the mother to the father. The mother argues on appeal that there was no change of circumstances to support a change of custody, and no proof that the change would be in the best interest of the children. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Leonard W. Martin |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| City of Oak Hill v. AAMP
M2001-00688-COA-R3-CV
This appeal concerns the City of Oak Hill's efforts to enforce its exclusively residential zoning restrictions over a parcel of land situated at the city's eastern border. The city appeals the trial court's finding that "parcel 109" was located outside of Oak Hill's city boundary and, therefore, not subject to the city's zoning ordinances. We affirm the action of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| McLane Co. v. State
M2002-00838-COA-R3-CV
Licensed wholesale tobacco distributor filed petition against the State seeking the disclosure of identities of all licensed tobacco wholesale distributors in the State of Tennessee pursuant to the provisions of the Tennessee Public Records Act. State opposed petition on the grounds that disclosure of this information was controlled by the taxpayer confidentiality provisions of the revenue statutes. Chancery Court granted petition and ordered disclosure of the names and addresses of all licensed wholesale tobacco distributors in Tennessee but, on the state's motion, stayed its order pending appeal. State appeals. We reverse and dismiss.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Edward Howell vs. NHC Healthcare
E2002-01321-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court refused to enforce an Agreement for Mediation and Arbitration. On appeal, we Affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Harold Wimberly |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Ray Wright v. Brittany Pate
11-01-135-M
Originating Judge:A. Andrew Jackson |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| E2002-01703-COA-R3-CV
E2002-01703-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Telford E. Forgerty, Jr. |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Peter Zabaski v. Mary Ann Zabaski
M2001-02013-COA-R3-CV
The trial court granted a divorce to the parents of an only child with a history of severe medical problems, and awarded them joint custody. The wife contends on appeal that the trial court's order of custody and visitation was not in the child's best interest. She also argues that the court erred by setting the husband's child support obligation too low, and by failing to award her alimony in futuro. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Marietta M. Shipley |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Sandra Sparkman & Joe Sparkman vs. Bluecross Blueshield
E2002-00932-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs' action was dismissed by the Trial Court on the grounds plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative appeals. On appeal, we Vacate and Remand.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Samuel H. Payne |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 12/11/02 | |
| Carrie Mildred Mayer Dube v. Michael Norman Dube
E2002-00413-COA-R3-CV
Carrie Mildred Mayer Dube ("Wife") sued Michael Norman Dube ("Husband") for a divorce. Wife is primarily a stay-at-home mother and Husband is an emergency room physician. The Trial Court divided the marital property with 65% of the property going to Wife. The Trial Court awarded Wife permanent alimony of $3,200 per month after finding Wife could not be sufficiently rehabilitated. Child support was set based on Husband's income for 2000, during which time he claims to have worked approximately 90 hours per week. Husband appeals the division of marital property, award of permanent alimony, and amount of child support which was based on his 90 hour work week. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 12/09/02 | |
| Sally Qualls Mercer, et al., v. Vanderbilt University, Inc., et al.
M2000-00801-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a medical malpractice case arising out of the emergency treatment of an intoxicated driver who sustained catastrophic injuries in a single-vehicle accident. The driver's conservator filed suit in the Circuit Court for Davidson County alleging that the negligence of the driver's healthcare providers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center caused him to suffer irreversible brain injury that left him in a persistent vegetative state. A jury returned a verdict for the driver, assessing his damages at $7,366,000 and allocating seventy percent of the fault to Vanderbilt and thirty percent of the fault to the driver. Thereafter, the trial court determined as a matter of law that the driver's damages had been caused by a separate injury for which Vanderbilt was entirely responsible. Accordingly, the trial court set aside the jury's allocation of fault and entered a judgment holding Vanderbilt one hundred percent at fault for the entire amount of the driver's damages. We have determined that the judgment must be vacated and that Vanderbilt is entitled to a new trial because of the cumulative effect of the trial court's errors in excluding the testimony of three of Vanderbilt's witnesses as well as evidence of the driver's alcohol-related conduct.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:Judge Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 12/05/02 | |
| Daniel Paul Spatafore v. Catherine Juanelle Spatafore
E2001-02459-COA-R3-CV
In this action, the Trial Court awarded custody of the parties' minor child to the father, and the mother has appealed.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Judge John B. Hagler, Jr. |
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 12/05/02 | |
| Rhandie Parker, et al., v. Wanda McDaniel, et al.
E2001-03110-COA-R3-CV
Shannon Dale Welch ("Welch") and Stacy Ann Brooks ("Brooks") were the only two occupants in an automobile traveling at a high rate of speed when it collided with a vehicle driven by Rhandie Parker ("Parker"). Parker's brother-in-law, Hershel D. Williams ("Williams"), was a passenger in his vehicle. As a result of the accident, Parker claimed $27,100 in property damage, medical expenses of $8,241.52, and personal injuries. Williams claimed medical expenses totaling $9,545.38 and personal injuries. Parker's wife, Janice Parker ("Ms. Parker"), asserted a claim for loss of consortium. A jury returned a verdict against Welch in favor of Parker for $35,000, and awarded Ms. Parker nothing. Williams was awarded $29,000. All three Plaintiffs appeal with the primary issue being the adequacy of the verdict. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Judge O. Duane Slone |
Grainger County | Court of Appeals | 12/03/02 | |
| William Davis vs. Reliance Electric Industrial
E2002-00973-COA-R3-CV
Arbitrator awarded compensatory and punitive damages to plaintiff for retaliatory discharge. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/02 | |
| Dorothy Rault Heideman v. Richard Lawrence Heideman
W2001-01486-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Karen R. Williams |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/27/02 | |
| W2001-03088-COA-R3-CV
W2001-03088-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/02 | |
| In Re: The Estate of Martha G. Spencer
M2001-02187-COA-R3-CV
The origin of this appeal was a claim made against the Estate of Martha G. Spencer, by NHC Health Care of Lewisburg, a skilled nursing home, for services rendered her in the amount of $25,934.54. After a plenary trial the Chancellor dismissed the claim upon finding that NHC was estopped from pursuing its claim because of representations made that Ms. Spencer's expenses were covered by Medicare. NHC appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:J. B. Cox |
Marshall County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/02 | |
| Shirley Daniel vs. James Daniel
W2002-01103-COA-R3-CV
This is an alimony case. At the time of the divorce, the parties had been married for almost thirty-one years. The husband was fifty-one years old, and the wife was forty-five years old. The husband owned his own backhoe/trackhoe company. The wife was a homemaker and raised the parties' three children. She has a sixth-grade education and earned her GED in 1997. Since the parties' separation, the wife had held five jobs but had not been able to maintain her employment. The parties agreed on the division of personal and real property, but disagreed over the value of the husband's business property. The trial court found that the husband made it difficult to ascertain the parties' financial situation. The trial court also found that the wife was economically disadvantaged and could not be rehabilitated. The wife was awarded alimony in futuro and attorney's fees. On appeal, the husband argues that the trial court erred in awarding the wife alimony in futuro and attorney's fees. We affirm, finding that the trial court did not err in concluding that the wife cannot be rehabilitated and in awarding alimony in futuro and attorney's fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:William Michael Maloan |
Obion County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/02 | |
| Donna Seals vs. Larry Seals
E2002-00100-COA-R3-CV
Donna Lynn Seals ("Wife") and Larry Clyde Seals ("Husband") were divorced in 2001, after seventeen years of marriage. The parties have one minor child ("Child"). Wife was primarily a stay-at-home mother during the marriage. Husband is employed as a general superintendent by Williams Union Boiler. The Trial Court found Husband's earnings for 2001 to be $117,000 in regular wages plus $16,380 in per diem. The Trial Court awarded Wife the parties' home in Hamilton County as alimony in solido and further ordered Husband to pay rehabilitative alimony in the amount of $1,365 per month for forty-two consecutive months. The Trial Court also ordered Husband to pay $2,063 per month in child support, which is an upward deviation due to Husband's absence of overnight parenting time since December 2000. Husband filed a post-trial Tenn. R. Civ. P. 52.01 motion for findings of fact. The Trial Court addressed this motion and entered its Final Decree of Divorce in November 2001. Husband appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Howell N. Peoples |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/02 | |
| Mary F. Hall. v. Mary Rose Pippin.
M2000-01151-COA-R3-CV
The Defendants, Mary Rose Pippin and Dale Delaney appeal the Trial Court's dismissal of a Rule 60 motion, which attacked a previous determination by the Trial Court relative to their right to maintain a fence across a roadway over which the Plaintiffs, Mary F. Hall and Don K. Hall claim a private right-of-way. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Vernon Neal |
Putnam County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/02 | |
| Linda Sue Hathaway vs. Glenn Hathaway
E2002-00659-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court ordered father to pay daughter's tuition to a college of her choice, based upon a provision in the Marriage Dissolution Agreement. On appeal, we modify.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Bill Swann |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 11/26/02 | |
| Debra Persada vs. Tim Persada
E2002-00397-COA-R3-CV
In divorce action the parties reached an agreed property settlement by mediation. Before Judgment, the husband repudiated the agreement, but the Trial Court heard evidence on the validity of the agreement and enforced the agreement by entering Judgment thereon. We affirm on appeal.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:G. Richard Johnson |
Johnson County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/02 | |
| Charles Montague vs. Michael Kellum
E2002-01733-COA-R3-CV
This legal malpractice claim arises from the filing by attorney Michael D. Kellum ("Defendant") of an unverified post-conviction petition on behalf of Charles Montague ("Plaintiff"). The post-conviction petition was dismissed by the Criminal Court on the merits and because it was not verified. We vacated a previous grant of summary judgment to Defendant to allow Plaintiff time to conduct discovery. While on remand and during discovery, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Plaintiff's post-conviction proceeding for the sole reason that the petition was unverified. Thereafter, the Trial Court again dismissed this lawsuit after concluding, inter alia, Plaintiff had suffered no damages. We vacate and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Jean A. Stanley |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/02 |