Please enter some keywords to search.
| Cathy Lovett v. John Kelley
M2002-01078-COA-R3-CV
A woman whose car was struck by another vehicle brought suit against the driver of a van involved in the accident as well as the driver's employer, claiming the collision aggravated her pre-existing back injury. The defendants did not dispute liability, but claimed that the plaintiff's injury was relatively minor. After a hearing, the trial court entered a $100,000 judgment against the defendants. We reverse, because we believe the trial court's award included damages for injuries that were not proximately caused by the defendant's actions.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| Adrian Scaife vs.Chantelle Roberson
E2002-02666-COA-R3-CV
John D. Knowles, Jr. ("Deceased") died intestate in December of 2000. A Petition for Intestate Administration ("Petition") filed in April of 2001, listed Adrian Scaife ("Plaintiff") as one of Deceased's daughters. This Petition never was granted. Several months later, an Amended Petition for Intestate Administration ("Amended Petition") was filed. The Amended Petition listed Plaintiff as an heir, but did not state Plaintiff's relationship to the Deceased. A. Chantelle Roberson ("Defendant") sought to be appointed administratrix of the Deceased's estate (the "Estate") and signed the Amended Petition. The Amended Petition was granted and Defendant was named administratrix of the Estate in June of 2001. The Notice to Creditors for the Estate was published in June and July of 2001. Notice to Creditor letters were sent to all known creditors and any persons having claims, or believed to have claims, against the Estate. Plaintiff received a copy of the Letters of Administration and a Notice to Creditor letter informing her that in order to inherit from the Deceased, she would need to establish paternity within the four month time period allowed to creditors for filing claims. Plaintiff took no steps to establish paternity within the four month period. In February of 2002, Plaintiff sued seeking to prohibit Defendant from denying Plaintiff is a child of the Deceased. The Trial Court granted Defendant summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Howell N. Peoples |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| James Pylant v. Karen Spivey
M2002-00602-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute over the extent of a father's obligation, under a provision in a property settlement agreement, to pay for his daughter's college education. The daughter chose to attend an expensive private college. The trial court found that father should pay tuition equivalent to the cost of an out-of-state public university. Both parties appealed. We affirm the trial court's decision that the father is obligated to pay reasonable costs, but vacate the judgment because there is insufficient proof of such costs.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Robert L. Holloway |
Giles County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| Stephen Morgan v. Paula Morgan
M2002-00793-COA-R3-CV
Husband and Wife were declared divorced on the basis of stipulated grounds. Wife appeals the classification and division of the property. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| Anne Strickland vs. Daniel Cartwright
E2002-02176-COA-R3-CV
Anne Strickland ("Plaintiff") approached Daniel Cartwright ("Defendant") about the possible purchase of Defendant's restaurant. Unable to come up with the full purchase price of $1.5 million, Plaintiff made an initial payment of $170,000 and began leasing the restaurant with monthly rental payments of $7,000. No written agreement ever was finalized between the parties. Plaintiff vacated the premises after six months allegedly due to the poor condition of the building and the amount of repairs that were needed. Plaintiff filed suit seeking a return of the $170,000, claiming this money was intended by the parties to be a down payment on the purchase of the restaurant, an event which never occurred. Defendant claimed the parties had agreed to a nonrefundable initial payment of $250,000 to allow Plaintiff the privilege of being able to walk in and take over a fully staffed and operational restaurant. Since Plaintiff paid only $170,000 toward the initial $250,000 payment, Defendant filed a counterclaim for the remaining $80,000. After a trial, the Trial Court awarded Plaintiff a judgment in the amount of $138,000. Both parties appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Telford E. Forgerty, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| Shamery Blair vs. West Town Mall
E2002-02005-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| Messer Griesheim dba MG Industries vs. Cryotech
E2002-01728-COA-R3-CV
This appeal from the Knox County Circuit Court questions whether the Trial Court erred in granting a summary judgment in favor of the Appellee/Defendant, Eastman Chemical Company, with respect to various claims connected with the purchase and sale of contaminated carbon dioxide by the Appellant/Plaintiff, Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc., d/b/a MG Industries. We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Wheeler A. Rosenbalm |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| Shamery Blair vs. West Town Mall
E2002-02005-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/13/03 | |
| John Doe vs. Randall Pedigo
E2002-01311-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
|
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| Herbert Heinze vs. Patricia Severt
E2002-01184-COA-R3-CV
In this appeal from the Chancery Court for Greene County the Appellant, Herbert Arthur Heinze, contends that the Trial Court erred in finding that a valid accord and satisfaction was entered into between him and the Appellee, Patricia Christine Severt (Heinze), with respect to the distribution of proceeds realized from the sale of the parties' marital residence pursuant to a divorce judgment. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court and remand for collection of costs and enforcement of the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| In Re: Petition of James F. Watson, General Sessions Court Judge
E2002-02480-COA-R3-CV
This is a declaratory judgment action. Judge James F. Watson was, at all relevant times, the general sessions court judge for McMinn County. Prior to 2000, McMinn County was classified as a county of the second class and Judge Watson was paid in accordance with the statutory compensation scheme for such counties. As a result of the 2000 census, McMinn County became a county of the first class. Judge Watson filed a petition seeking a determination as to the proper calculation of his salary as a class one general sessions court judge. The trial court determined that Judge Watson was entitled to continue receiving the jurisdictional supplements to his salary that he had been receiving as a class two judge. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
|
McMinn County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| Wanda Shadwick vs. F.H. Shoemaker
E2002-01525-COA-R3-CV
Wanda Shadwick, individually, and as Executrix of the Estate of her common-law husband, Kenneth Lee Phillips, sued F. H. Shoemaker Distributors, Inc., and Floyd H. Shoemaker, II. The theory of the lawsuit is that the Defendants were guilty of abuse of process in connection with the sale of certain real estate and personal property owned by Kenneth Lee Phillips at the time of his death to pay a claim of the Corporation against his Estate. This claim, in the amount of $25,079.54, had been sustained by the Probate Judge. We find that neither the Corporation nor Mr. Shoemaker are liable for the misdeeds of Max Huff, the first attorney employed by them. Having so found, we reverse the judgment both as to compensatory damages in the amount of $156,000 which, incidentally, was higher than Ms. Shadwick's testimony as to the wholesale value of the personal property, and of punitive damages in the amount of $250,000, which was the amount of the ad damnum clause in the complaint. Mr. Shoemaker filed a counter-complaint seeking to recover the amount paid in delinquent taxes as to a house and lot he purchased at the purported sale, as well as delinquent taxes owed thereon. On this issue the jury found in favor of Ms. Shadwick and we affirm this determination.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Billy Joe White |
Scott County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| State, et Rel. Robyn Russell vs. Jackson West
E2002-01667-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| State, et Rel. Robyn Russell vs. Jackson West
E2002-01667-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| John Doe vs. Randall Pedigo
E2002-01311-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Harold Wimberly |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| Brenda Jones vs. David Jones
E2002-01684-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce case, David Wayne Jones (Husband) filed a motion requesting the Trial Court to discontinue alimony payments. The sole basis for the motion was that Brenda Gail McNeeley Jones (Wife) was "currently residing with a male individual." Wife denied that a reduction in alimony was appropriate, due to her alleged continuing need and Husband's continuing ability to pay. Wife moved for an increase in alimony payments due to her "increased medical expenses, and vocational disability that [she] suffers by reason of the need for eye surgery." The Trial Court awarded Husband a reduction in the amount of alimony from $1,500 per month to $1,000 per month. On appeal, Husband argues that the Trial Court erred by refusing to eliminate the alimony payments, and Wife argues that the Court erred by reducing them. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:G. Richard Johnson |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 02/12/03 | |
| In the Matter of: Conservatorship of Ellen Groves
M2000-00782-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves the conservatorship of an elderly widow. Both the widow's brother-in-law and a niece filed petitions in the Chancery Court for Montgomery County requesting to be appointed her conservator. Following a bench trial, the trial court determined that the widow was "competent" and, therefore, dismissed both conservatorship petitions. The trial court also disapproved the brother-in-law's accounting of his expenditures on the widow's behalf and directed the brother-in-law and his wife to return the widow's real and personal property to her. On this appeal, the widow's brother-in-law asserts that the trial court erred (1) by refusing to appoint him conservator, (2) by refusing to approve reimbursing him for his expenses in caring for his sister-in-law, and (3) by directing him to return his sister-in-law's real and personal property. We have determined that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's conclusions that the widow is not disabled and that she does not need a conservator. However, we have also determined that the trial court properly declined to reimburse the widow's brother-in-law for his expenses in caring for her and properly ordered him to return her real and personal property.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Montgomery County | Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | |
| Margaret Wightman vs. Truman Clouse
E2002-00318-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court held plaintiff was entitled to use roadway across defendants' land. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
|
Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | ||
| Jackson Rose vs. Rick Welch
E2002-02042-COA-R3-CV
Attorney R. Jackson Rose ("Plaintiff") was hired by Rick Welch ("Defendant') to defend him on drug related criminal charges. The parties agreed to a flat fee of $25,000 for this legal representation. A retainer of $5,000 was paid up-front. Defendant signed a promissory note for the remaining $20,000. Defendant claims he lost confidence in Plaintiff's ability to adequately represent him after Defendant paid a total of $6,850 in attorney fees. Defendant discharged Plaintiff and obtained new counsel. Plaintiff sued for breach of contract. Defendant filed a counterclaim for legal malpractice and also claimed as a defense, inter alia, that Plaintiff's representation fell below the professional standard of care. The case was tried to a jury. After all of the proof was presented, the Trial Court directed a verdict for Plaintiff because Defendant had offered no expert proof to support his counterclaim or his defense to the breach of contract claim. We hold expert proof was not necessary in order for Defendant to prove he lost confidence in Plaintiff and discharged him with cause for that reason. We, therefore, reverse the entry of the directed verdict as to that issue only and remand the case for trial on the sole issue of termination for cause because of Defendant's "loss of confidence." We affirm all other aspects of the Trial Court's judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Claiborne County | Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | |
| Shirley Klein vs. David Klein
E2002-00867-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce proceeding the wife, Shirley Jean Klein, appeals the judgment of the Trial Court which held that Ms. Klein was not entitled to alimony. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Ben K. Wexler |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | |
| Zora Elsea vs. Frank Elsea
E2002-00387-COA-R3-CV
In this divorce action, the Trial Court identified, valued and divided marital property and awarded wife alimony. Husband appeals. We affirm the Trial Court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant |
McMinn County | Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | |
| Robert M. Overholt, M.D., et al vs. Hugh Ray Wilson
E2002-01479-COA-R3-CV
In this suit, Plaintiffs Robert M. Overholt, Joe W. Black, and Michael D. Price sue Defendant Hugh Ray Wilson, seeking possession of a portrait of long-time University of Tennessee football coach, General Robert R. Neyland. The suit also sought injunctive relief as to a proposed sale of the portrait by Mr. Wilson in connection with a bankruptcy sale of assets of a corporation owned by him. Mr. Wilson's sole defense of the suit was that it was barred by T.C.A. 28-3-105(2), the three-year statute of limitations for recovery of personal property. The trial court submitted to the jury a single question regarding the only material factual dispute, and upon receipt of the jury's finding held that the statute of limitations was not a viable defense and granted judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. Mr. Wilson appeals and raises four issues, hereinafter set out, for our consideration. We find that they are without merit and affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | |
| Margaret Wightman vs. Truman Clouse
E2002-00318-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court held plaintiff was entitled to use roadway across defendants' land. On appeal, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Vernon Neal |
Cumberland County | Court of Appeals | 02/11/03 | |
| Steven Means v. David Ashby
M2002-00285-COA-R3-CV
Current custodian of Minor Child petitioned the court for termination of parental rights of both parents. Petitioners are the brother and sister-in-law of Minor Child's mother. The parents of the Minor Child are divorced. Mother had no contact with Minor Child for over a year prior to the Petition, and Father has had no contact for approximately five years. We find that any failure to visit by the parents and failure to support by the Mother was not willful and affirm the trial court in dismissing the Petition to Terminate their parental rights. However, the trial court's custody determination is vacated, and that issue is remanded for further consideration.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/10/03 | |
| Maury County v. Board of Equalization
M2002-00501-COA-R3-CV
Following a de novo hearing pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-1511(b), the Chancery Court of Davidson County upheld the final decision of the Assessment Appeals Commission of the Tennessee State Board of Equalization in a determination that property owned by Maury Regional Hospital and located in Marshall County, Tennessee was subject to ad valorem taxation by Marshall County. Maury Regional Hospital appeals the decision of the Chancellor. The decision of the trial court is reversed, and the Marshall County property known as Marshall Medical Center is held to be exempt from ad valorem taxation.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Maury County | Court of Appeals | 02/10/03 |