State vs. Robert Bitner
02C01-9705-CC-00177
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

State vs. Donald Long
02C01-9610-CC-00362
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Johnny Moffitt vs. Carthel Smith
02A01-9705-CV-00095
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Shelby County Deputy from the Shelby County Sheriff's Association, et al., v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al.
02A01-9706-CH-00126
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor D. J. Alissandratos

This appeal involves a declaratory judgment suit in chancery court related to a previous proceeding in criminal court pursuant to the provisions of the “anti-fee statutes,” T.C.A. § 8-20- 101 et seq.. The plaintiffs are Shelby County Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Sergeant Ronald A. Houston, Sergeant Robert Michael Shelby, Sergeant Ronald Ray, and Sergeant Mark Rochevot. The defendants are Shelby County, Tennessee, the Shelby County Commission, Mayor Jim Rout and Sheriff A. C. Gilless, Jr. The complaint alleges in substance as follows:

Ray Thompson vs. State
02A01-9705-BC-00102

State vs. Hoxie
03S01-9706-CR-00061

Geneva Grahl vs. Lillie Davis, Et al
03S01-9701-CV-00011

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

State vs. Timothy Dean Martin
01C01-9609-CC-00393
Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee

Lutcher Eidson vs. State
01C01-9607-CR-00295
Trial Court Judge: Thomas H. Shriver

State vs. Anthony Merlo
01C01-9611-CC-00471
Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee

State vs. Landy Kash
01C01-9705-CR-00179
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond

State vs. Daniel Bailey
02C01-9612-CR-00456
Trial Court Judge: L. Terry Lafferty

Rudy Holmes vs. Sheriff Jack Owens, et al
02A01-9706-CV-00115
Trial Court Judge: James E. Swearengen

State vs. Irwin
03S01-9702-CC-00021

State vs. Grapel Simpson
02S01-9702-CC-00010

State of Tennessee v. Fred Arthur Stier
W1999-600-CCA-R3-CD
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

Dennis O'Neal Milligan v. Ten-State, Inc .
02S01-9612-CV-00110
Authoring Judge: Robert A. Lanier, Circuit Judge
Trial Court Judge: Lanier, Judge
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated Section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. On or about July 9, 1993, while employed by the defendant, the claimant was attempting to move a mobile home with the assistance of fellow employees when his foot slipped and he was caused to twist and fall to his knee. He felt a burning sensation in his lower back shortly thereafter and reported this to his supervisor. The company referred him to a Dr. Howard Thomas, who in turn referred him to Dr. R. J. Hornsby. In the course of his examinations and treatments by these physicians, he underwent not only an MRI, an EMG and nerve conduction study, but also an epidural block and myelogram, which gave him a severe spinal headache. Because he continued to complain of pain in the low back upon examination, he was also evaluated by a physical therapist, who reported, ". . . he was totally inconsistent in every test and no impairment was noted that was consistent." (Notes of Dr. Hornsby). No permanent disability rating was given by either Dr. Hornsby or Dr. Thomas. However, claimant was referred by his attorney on October 4, 1994 to Dr. Robert Barnett, for an evaluation. Dr. Barnett saw him one time. Dr. Barnett said that he "thought that he had some lumbar radiculopathy, probably aggravation of preexisting degenerative changes." Dr. Barnett was also of the opinion that the claimant has a permanent impairment of ten percent (1%) of the whole body. When asked what the opinion was based upon, the doctor replied, Medically documented injury with the pain and stiffness, with some radiculopathy, and some limited motion, [giving a reference to the AMA guides]. (Deposition of Dr. Barnett, page 9). The doctor was then asked whether or not the history of claimant injuring himself in July of 1993 on the job "was consistent" with his diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy and a ten percent (1%) permanent impairment to the body as a whole. The doctor 2

Geyer vs. Geyer
01A01-9707-CH-00372
Trial Court Judge: Gerald L. Ewell, Sr.

Venture Express vs. Zilly, Ind.
01A01-9704-CV-00172
Trial Court Judge: Joseph Daniel

Dooley (Blalock) vs. Dooley
01A01-9704-CV-00174
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Harrison, et. al. vs. Laursen, et. al.
01A01-9705-CH-00238
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton

Tarkington vs. Tarkington
01A01-9706-CV-00270

Landry, Jr. vs. Rudd
01A01-9707-CV-00303
Trial Court Judge: William C. Koch

Curtis Landry, Jr., D/B/A Landry and Associates, v. John Daniel Rudd
01A01-9707-CV-00303
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert E. Corlew

The defendant, John Daniel Rudd, has appealed from a judgment of the Trial Court allowing the enrollment of two foreign judgments, both in favor of the plaintiff, John Landry and against the defendant.