State of Tennessee, ex rel., Kimberly Norfleet v. Tommy Dobbs, Jr.
01A01-9805-CV-00228
This appeal involves a parent’s efforts to avoid paying child support for her two children. Approximately two years after the Circuit Court for Davidson County awarded custody of the parties’ two children to their father, the children’s mother, with the assistance of a lawyer furnished by the IV-D contractor for Davidson County, filed a petition to eliminate her child support obligation because she was unemployed and her only income was Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) payments. Following a bench trial, the trial court denied the mother’s petition on the ground that she was voluntarily unemployed. The mother asserts on this appeal that the trial court’s order conflicts with the child support guidelines because she will be required to use her SSI payments to pay her child support. We have determined that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s finding that the mother is voluntarily unemployed and that the trial court’s order is consistent with the child support guidelines. Therefore, we affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/01/99 | |
State of Tennessee v. Preston Carter - Concurring
02S01-9705-CR-00045
In this capital case, the defendant, Preston Carter, pled guilty and was convicted on two counts of felony murder. A jury sentenced him to death on both counts, finding that the murders of Thomas and Tensia Jackson were especially heinous, atrocious, and cruel. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-2-203(i)(5). The jury imposed sentences of death based upon the presence of this sole aggravating circumstance.
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Shelby County | Supreme Court | 02/01/99 | |
State of Tennessee v. Gerald Robert Stevens, Laurie Ann Williams, and James Darren Brothers Stevens, et al.
02S01-9712-CC-00112
We granted this appeal to determine whether a conclusory allegation in an affidavit that information was provided by a “concerned citizen source” is sufficient to establish the presumptive reliability of the information for the issuance of a search warrant under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 7 of the Tennessee Constitution.1 There is a distinction in Tennessee law between “citizen informants” and “criminal informants” or those from the criminal milieu. Information provided by an unnamed ordinary citizen is presumed to be reliable, and the affidavit need not establish that the source is credible or that the information is reliable. State v. Melson, 638 S.W.2d 342, 354 (Tenn. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1137, 103 S. Ct. 770, 74 L. Ed. 2d 983 (1983). On the other hand, where information is provided by an anonymous criminal informant, the affidavit must establish (1) the basis of the informant’s knowledge, and (2) the reliability of the informant or the information. State v. Jacumin, 778 S.W.2d 430 (Tenn. 1989).
Authoring Judge: Chief Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Judge Julian P. Guinn |
Henry County | Supreme Court | 02/01/99 | |
Charles Walton Wright v. State of Tennessee
01S01-9709-CR-00196
We granted this appeal to determine whether the appellant’s due process rights were violated when the lower courts dismissed his post conviction petition as timebarred by the three-year statute of limitations since the asserted violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963), did not arise until after expiration of the three-year statute of limitations.
Authoring Judge: Chief Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Judge Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 02/01/99 | |
Scottie Allen Yant v. Arrow Exterminators, Inc.
01A01-9801-CV-00004
The manager of an exterminating company brought criminal charges against the owner of a competing company for the alleged theft of a piece of equipment. The general sessions court determined that probable cause existed, but the grand jury declined to indict. The defendant in the criminal case subsequently filed suit for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted summary judgment to the civil defendant. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Judge Barbara N. Haynes |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/01/99 | |
State of Tennessee v. Kristina Schindler
03S01-9804-CR-00040
We granted this appeal to address whether a trial court can consider prior grants of diversion or previously expunged offenses in determining a defendant's suitability for diversion. In the case now before us, the trial court denied the defendant's request for judicial diversion because the defendant had previously been placed on diversion on two different occasions. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision to deny the defendant's application for judicial diversion. Upon review, we hold that evidence of prior diversions may be considered in determining whether a defendant is a suitable candidate for diversion.
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Judge Mary Beth Leibowitz |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 02/01/99 | |
Robert James Watkins v. Inman Construction Corp.
02S01-9710-CH-00098
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff, Robert James Watkins, injured his right ankle on February 2, 1995 in the course of his employment for Inman Construction Company. He was temporarily working in Oxford, Mississippi, but was employed to work in Memphis, Tennessee. After hearing the evidence, the trial judge found that the plaintiff sustained a permanent partial disability of thirty-five percent to the right leg. The court also found that the plaintiff had been paid temporary total disability benefits for the period prior to October 1, 1995. The trial judge also found that the plaintiff worked sporadically on a part-time basis for the defendant from October 3, 1995 until December 29, 1995 and that plaintiff was entitled to temporary partial disability benefits through that period. The court also found that the plaintiff suffered temporary total disability from the date of the injury until November 7, 1996, excluding the periodfor temporary partial disability, and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover additional temporary total compensation for the period from October 1, 1995 until November 7, 1996 except for the aforesaid period for which an award was made for temporary partial disability benefits. The court also directed the defendant to pay the medical expense incurred for treatment of plaintiff by Dr. T. E. Rizk in the sum of $85.. On this appeal, the defendant presents two issues: (1) Whether the trial court's award of temporary total disability benefits following the date of maximum medical improvement was error. (2) Whether the trial court erred in ordering the employer to pay for the medical treatment of Dr. T. E. Rizk. The defendant does not attack the portion of the judgment awarding compensation for 35 percent permanent partial disability to the leg. It is conceded that the plaintiff injured the Achilles tendon of his right ankle while working on a construction site for defendant on February 2, 1995. He was treated conservatively by Dr. Wayne Lamar until May 16, 1995 when Dr. Lamar performed surgery 2
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Neal Small, Chancellor |
Shelby County | Workers Compensation Panel | 01/29/99 | |
State vs. Ricky Woodard
01C01-9802-CC-00056
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
Macklin vs. Macklin
03A01-9807-CV-00232
|
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
State vs. Tiffany Betts
02C01-9709-CC-00337
|
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
State vs. Donald Stephens
01C01-9711-CC-00551
Originating Judge:Henry Denmark Bell |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
Slate vs. Hooper
03A01-9809-CH-00299
Originating Judge:Ben W. Hooper, II |
Sevier County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
State vs. Lamb
03C01-9708-CC-00346
|
Hamblen County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
State vs. Tony Williams
02C01-9810-CC-00301
|
Henry County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
Olympia Child vs. City Maryville
03A01-9804-CV-00136
|
Court of Appeals | 01/29/99 | ||
State vs. Michael Clark
01C01-9802-CC-00087
|
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
Scott vs. Scott
03A01-9708-CH-00305
|
Court of Appeals | 01/29/99 | ||
State vs. Christopher Eacholes
02C01-9803-CR-00065
|
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
Simmons vs. Simmons
03A01-9805-CV-00158
|
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
State vs. Huskey
03C01-9811-CR-00410
Originating Judge:Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/29/99 | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | 01/28/99 | ||
Aaron Walker vs. State
03C01-9802-CR-00046
|
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/28/99 | |
State vs. Bohnenstiel
03C01-9801-CC-00035
|
Sevier County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/28/99 | |
Roger Harris vs. State
03C01-9712-CR-00516
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Unicoi County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 01/28/99 | |
Booze vs. Fairfield Communities
03A01-9803-CV-00095
|
Court of Appeals | 01/28/99 |