Please enter some keywords to search.
| Stanley Kline vs. William Benefiel
W1999-00918-COA-R3-CV
This case arises from a home construction contract entered into by the Appellants and the Appellees. The Appellants filed a complaint against the Appellees in the Circuit Court of Shelby County for breach of contract. The Appellees filed a counter-complaint for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. The Appellants filed an amended complaint for violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The trial court dismissed the Appellees' counter-complaint and found in favor of the Appellees as to the Appellants' complaint. The Appellants appeal from the order of the Circuit Court of Shelby County, finding in favor of the Appellees. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/18/00 | |
| State vs. Wilson
E1996-00006-SC-R11-CD
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County, where Brandon Wilson, the defendant, pleaded guilty to seven counts of delivery of cocaine and to three counts (merged by the trial court into one count) of possession of cocaine with the intent to sell or deliver. Wilson appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals contending, inter alia, that his indictments were legally insufficient and that the trial court erred in accepting the guilty plea because it was not voluntarily entered. The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed and reversed Wilson's convictions on all counts. We hold that the seven indictments for delivery of cocaine are sufficient; Wilson's convictions on these indictments are, therefore, reinstated. Additionally, because the issue concerning the voluntariness of Wilson's plea was not properly before the intermediate appellate court, we reinstate the conviction for possession of cocaine. This reinstatement is without prejudice to Wilson's right to file a petition for post-conviction relief within the appropriate time.
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Supreme Court | 09/18/00 | |
| Gratz Carden, Jr. v. The Tennessee Coal Company
E1999-01213-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for a hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appellant/defendant challenges the trial court's award of permanent and total disability benefits to the appellee/plaintiff. Also, the appellant contends that the evidence does not support the trial court's award of benefits to the body as a whole. After an in-depth review of the entire record, briefs of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court is Affirmed. LAFFERTY, SR. J., in which BARKER, J., and PEOPLES, SP. J., joined. Robert W. Knolton, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for the appellant, The Tennessee Coal Company. Roger L. Ridenour, Clinton, Tennessee, for the appellee, Gratz Carden, Jr. MEMORANDUM OPINION Trial Testimony The plaintiff, age 56, testified that he left the eighth (8th) grade to help supplement the family income. He worked in service stations, construction, and spent two years in the United States Army. In 1968, the plaintiff went to work in the coal mines of east Tennessee until his injury of November 15, 1995. The plaintiff stated that he started out as a laborer, was a boss on the job, and served as safety director. At the time of his injury, the plaintiff was a scoop operator. The plaintiff described the coal mines in the Tennessee area as low seam mines. These mines are approximately four (4) feet high. Most of the time a miner must walk bent over or be on their knees. At the time of his injury, the plaintiff was operating a head drive, which drives a belt line. This belt line removes coal from the mine. The plaintiff testified that he had the scoop of the head drive at the top of the mine when he slipped off the back of the head drive, falling about four (4) feet, striking the side of the scoop. The plaintiff was removed from the mine and taken to the Oak Ridge Hospital, where he spent three (3) days. The plaintiff was seen by Dr. John Jernigan for loss of balance, stomach sickness, and loss of hearing. The plaintiff stated that he underwent surgery but his loss of hearing did not improve. After three (3) months, his balance improved where he could walk by himself. Without Dr. Jernigan's knowledge, the plaintiff returned to work, "thinking I was going to get over this . . . I was being told the right side of my brain would block out all this damage." At work, the plaintiff would answer the telephone and occasionally grease the belt line. However, the plaintiff would become sick and have to leave work on occasion. The plaintiff testified that he was laid off after sixteen (16) months when the company closed the mine. Since the injury, the plaintiff testified that he cannot work around the home and has difficulty with walking or gardening. The plaintiff described his vision problems at night, "I'm like a drunk man trying, when I'm in the dark, I just cannot function. I can shut my eyes and go from the living room to the bedroom, if I leave my eyes open I'm bouncing off the walls." The plaintiff stated that he had always worked and provided for his family. His wife did not work outside of the home because he wanted her to stay home and take care of the children. The plaintiff testified that he had sustained two (2) past injuries on the job. The plaintiff broke his right foot, and on another occasion he broke his jaw. As a result, he only missed enough work for the doctor to treat his injuries and returned immediately to work. Since the plaintiff's lay off, he has received no income, but he and his wife have existed on his withdrawn retirement fund. The plaintiff stated that he cannot work an eight (8) hour day or a five (5) day week, due to his dizziness and balance problems. The plaintiff testified that about the time of this surgery, he took medication for his dizziness. Mrs. Bobbie Jean Carden, the plaintiff's wife, testified that her husband has been a great husband and father. She stated that she has never had to work outside the home since it was not necessary. Since the accident, she stated that her husband does not have any balance, and he must be slow in whatever he is doing. Mrs. Carden testified that she cleans houses and cooks for the elderly ladies in the neighborhood for five dollars ($5) an hour. When describing her husband's driving, Mrs. Carden stated, "he scares me to death . . . he cannot hear." Mrs. Carden testified that her husband must wear sunglasses since the sun kills his eyes and gives him a headache. She stated that her husband has a high tolerance for pain. When he broke his jaw and foot he went back to work immediately. Dr. Rodney E. Caldwell, a vocational consultant, testified that he met the plaintiff on December 8, 1998. Dr. Caldwell obtained the plaintiff's beliefs as to his ability to return to work, and he also reviewed the deposition of Dr. Jernigan. Dr. Caldwell stated that, in the interview, the plaintiff had not exaggerated his symptoms, and that they were consistent with what the plaintiff had told Dr. Jernigan. Dr. Caldwell described Dr. Jernigan's definition of "good balance function to mean normal balance function," as rather vague. Dr. Caldwell stated that one with balance problems would have difficulty lifting, climbing and bending over because one would tend to topple over. -2-
Authoring Judge: Lafferty, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr., Judge |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 09/18/00 | |
| Elizabeth Cates vs. Herbert Cates
W1999-02359-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce dispute. Prior to divorce, the wife left the marital home, taking some of the parties' joint cash savings. On the day of the divorce hearing, the husband stipulated as to his inappropriate marital conduct, and the divorce was granted to the wife on that ground. The wife was awarded approximately 51% of the marital estate, rehabilitative alimony, and attorney's fees. The trial court excluded from its division of marital property the money the wife took when she moved out. The husband appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Martha B. Brasfield |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 09/18/00 | |
| Rain/Hail Ins. vs. James Peeler
W1999-01962-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit for the recovery of an insurance premium. The Appellant brought a complaint against the Appellee in the Circuit Court of Tipton County, seeking to recover the premium it claimed was due pursuant to a clause in the insurance policy. Both the Appellant and the Appellee brought motions for summary judgment. The trial court dismissed the Appellant's complaint and granted the Appellee's motion for summary judgment. The Appellant appeals the decision of the Circuit Court of Tipton County dismissing the Appellant's complaint and granting the Appellee's motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 09/18/00 | |
| State vs. Larry E. Scales
M1998-00142-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Larry E. Scales, appeals his conviction of theft over $500 and his six-year sentence as a career offender. Because the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the possible range of punishment, the judgment is reversed and the defendant is granted a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State vs. Jerry D. Carney
M1999-01139-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Jerry D. Carney, appeals his conviction by a jury in the Davidson County Criminal Court of first degree murder. Pursuant to his conviction for first degree murder, the trial court sentenced the appellant to life in prison in the Tennessee Department of Correction, with the possibility of parole. The appellant raises the following issues for our review: (1) whether there was sufficient evidence of premeditation to support his conviction of first degree murder; (2) whether the State violated Brady by failing to disclose audio taped statements made by the police of witnesses the day after the shooting; and (3) whether the trial court erred in precluding the appellant's cross-examination of the police officers who were testifying at trial about their training regarding self-defense and the application of deadly force. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Cheryl A. Blackburn |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| Michelle Baker Pisano v. Gerry Baker
W1999-02660-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:William Michael Maloan |
Weakley County | Court of Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Russell E. Mills
II-199-28-A
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State vs. Barry Waters Rogers
M1999-01358-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Barry Waters Rogers, was indicted for arson, conspiracy to commit arson, and vandalism. The jury acquitted the defendant on the charge of conspiracy to commit arson but, on the arson charge, returned a guilty verdict on the lesser included offense of facilitation of arson. Although the jury also returned a guilty verdict for facilitation of vandalism, the trial court later set that aside. The trial court imposed a Range I sentence of three and one-half years in the Department of Correction, with probation to be granted after the first year of service. In this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and complains that he was improperly sentenced. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Robert L. Jones |
Giles County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| Sam Simpson vs. Addie Davis
W1999-00689-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment action initiated by Sam Simpson against Addie Davis. Simpson alleged Davis breached her duty as trustee of her deceased mother's estate and was unjustly enriched by Simpson's construction of a residence on Davis' property. The trial court held that although Davis did not breach a fiduciary duty, she was unjustly enriched. The court ordered the sale of both the property and residence with proceeds to be allocated between the parties. Davis appeals.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Martha B. Brasfield |
Fayette County | Court of Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Larry E. Scales
1998-00142-CCA-R3-CD
Originating Judge:Charles D. Haston, Sr. |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State vs. Justin Victory
M2000-00015-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Justin Victory, entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated burglary before the Davidson County Criminal Court. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the defendant was to receive a sentence of four (4) years, with the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court denied the defendant's request for an alternative sentence and ordered the defendant to serve the sentence in the Davidson County CCA. Also, the trial court advised the defendant that upon completion of the Life Lines Substance Abuse Program, the trial court would suspend the balance of the sentence and determine proper restitution. In this appeal of right, the defendant complains that the trial court erred in denying him supervised probation. After a review of the record, the briefs of parties and applicable law, we modify the manner of the service of the defendant's sentence to 214 days incarceration with the remainder served on supervised probation.
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge L. Terry Lafferty
Originating Judge:Steve R. Dozier |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State vs. Robert C. Copas
M1999-00841-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Robert C. Copas, was indicted by a Sumner County Grand Jury for one count of aggravated rape. After discovering that the recording of the defendant's preliminary hearing was inaudible, the defendant moved to dismiss the indictment and remand for a new preliminary hearing pursuant to rule 5.1 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure. Following a hearing, the trial court did not dismiss the indictment, but remanded for a new preliminary hearing. The state then moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that case law requires dismissal of the indictment under these circumstances. The court agreed and dismissed the indictment but the state then brought this appeal. Because the trial court's dismissal of the indictment and remand for a new preliminary hearing was an appropriate remedy for a violation of the Tenn. R. Crim. P. 5.1 (a) the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Jane W. Wheatcraft |
Sumner County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| Frank Mills vs. Luis Wong
W1999-00665-COA-R9-CV
This appeal presents a dispute over proper venue arising out of a medical malpractice suit against multiple defendants. The Shelby County Circuit Court denied the Defendant's motion to dismiss for improper venue. The case is before this court on an interlocutory appeal.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Robert A. Lanier |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/15/00 | |
| State vs. Donaven Brown
W1999-00629-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant and the victim were both maximum security inmates at the Corrections Corporation of America facility in Clifton, Tennessee. After the victim, his hands and feet restrained, had been released from his cell to use a telephone, the defendant asked to be released from his cell take a shower. After his hands, but not his feet had been restrained, he pushed a correctional officer aside and ran from his cell, confronting the victim near the telephones. "Bad blood" had existed between the victim and the defendant, both of whom had armed themselves that day with shanks, or homemade prison knives. The victim received six knife stab wounds, two of which were potentially fatal. The defendant was then charged with first degree murder and felony possession of a weapon in a penal institution and, following his convictions of both offenses, sentenced to life without parole and three years, respectively, the sentences to be served concurrently. He timely appealed, presenting as issues whether the trial court erred in allowing proof that he had asserted his right to remain silent and requested an attorney and whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for first degree murder. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Henderson vs. Henderson
M1999-00912-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute over the Trial Court's valuation and division of marital property in this divorce action. Mrs. Henderson contends that the Trial Court undervalued the marital business, Quality Systems, Inc. Additionally, Mrs. Henderson asserts the Trial Court erred in dividing the marital assets and liabilities, denying alimony and attorney's fees and in ordering her to refund alimony pendente lite payments. We affirm the Trial Court's order, except for the denial of alimony. We vacate the Trial Court's determination on the issue of alimony and remand for a determination of the proper type and amount of alimony to be awarded to Mrs. Henderson.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Henderson vs. Henderson
M1999-00912-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute over the Trial Court's valuation and division of marital property in this divorce action. Mrs. Henderson contends that the Trial Court undervalued the marital business, Quality Systems, Inc. Additionally, Mrs. Henderson asserts the Trial Court erred in dividing the marital assets and liabilities, denying alimony and attorney's fees and in ordering her to refund alimony pendente lite payments. We affirm the Trial Court's order, except for the denial of alimony. We vacate the Trial Court's determination on the issue of alimony and remand for a determination of the proper type and amount of alimony to be awarded to Mrs. Henderson.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Ofman vs. Woodford
M1999-00736-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit by an attorney for breach of an oral contract relative to the professional services of an expert witness. Suit was instituted by civil warrant in the general sessions court. Following a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff, an appeal was perfected by the defendant to the circuit court where the case was tried de novo, non-jury and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,500.00. The defendant appealed, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Nancy Bloom vs. Douglas Bloom
W1998-00365-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case. The parties were married for eighteen years and had a fifteen year old son. The wife was granted the divorce. The wife was awarded, inter alia, the marital home and the equity in it, 60% of the value of various financial assets, her automobile, and various household furnishings. Custody of the parties' son was awarded to the wife, and the husband was granted supervised visitation. The husband was ordered to pay child support. The wife was awarded 60 months of rehabilitative alimony, with the rate of rehabilitative alimony to increase when the husband's child support obligation ends. The wife's request for attorney's fees was denied. The husband appeals the division of the marital property and the amount of rehabilitative alimony awarded. The wife appeals the denial of her request for attorney's fees. We affirm, finding that the preponderance of the evidence supports the trial court's division of the marital property, the award of alimony, and the denial of the wife's request for attorney's fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Kay S. Robilio |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Blaylock vs. Nash
M1999-00568-COA-R3-CV
This negligence action arises out of a collision between a cow and a car driven by the plaintiff. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant, the alleged owner and operator of a stockyard from which the cow supposedly escaped. We affirm the trial court's decision finding that the plaintiff presented no evidence that the defendant breached his duty of care. However, we do not find that the plaintiff's appeal of the trial court's decision was frivolous.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:John A. Turnbull |
Putnam County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| State vs. Retha Smith
W1999-00607-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals her jury conviction and sentence for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance with the intent to manufacture, sell or deliver. She received a sentence of three years with one year to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on community corrections. The defendant raises the following issues for review: (1) whether the evidence is insufficient to sustain her conviction; (2) whether the prosecuting attorney made improper remarks during his closing argument; and (3) whether her sentence is excessive. Upon a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court but remand for the assessment of the fine.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn |
Henry County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/14/00 | |
| Smith v. Safety Kleen Corporation
E1999-01123-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff, Everett Alan Smith, filed various motions in this case, all of which were denied by the trial court. The plaintiff appeals from the trial court's: (1) refusal to award temporary total benefits from the date of injury until time of medical improvement rating by physician or from the date of injury until trial; (2) denial of a lump sum payment of attorney fees because the request was in the form of a motion rather than in the form of a petition; (3) denial of motion requiring the defendant to pay for medication and authorized physician benefits because the plaintiff sought these by motion rather than by petition. The plaintiff also raises the issue of whether the trial court erred in refusing to pay certain pharmacy charges. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in part, reverse the judgment in part, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Howell N. Peoples, Chancellor |
Smith County | Workers Compensation Panel | 09/14/00 | |
| Steven Porreca v. Chili's Inc., & Liberty Mutual
E1999-00961-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff was burned while working for the defendant restaurant. The defendant did not dispute that the plaintiff suffered a compensable injury but did argue the award of fifty percent permanent partial disability was excessive and also contended the trial court should have allowed an offset for overpayment of approximately two weeks of temporary total disability. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Hon. Howell N. Peoples, Chancellor |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 09/14/00 | |
| Holley vs. Haehl
M1999-02105-COA-R3-CV
Landowner sued adjoining landowner and timber cutter in general sessions court for trespass and the cutting of timber on her land. From an adverse judgment, landowner appealed to the circuit court. After a trial de novo, the trial court held that adjoining landowner owned the land involved by adverse possession and entered judgment for defendants. Landowner has appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton |
Giles County | Court of Appeals | 09/14/00 |