Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Jeffrey Dwight Whaley
E2000-00646-CCA-R3-CD
The trial court dismissed defendant's DUI presentment, finding a denial of the right to a preliminary hearing. Upon the state's appeal, we find no evidence of bad faith by the state. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Danny Harold Ogle
E2000-00421-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant entered a best interest plea of guilty to vehicular homicide by recklessness. The plea attempted to reserve a certified question of law relating to the destruction of evidence; namely, the victim's vehicle. Specifically, defendant contends the destruction of the vehicle while it was under state control deprived him of due process, and the trial court should have dismissed the indictment. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that we have no jurisdiction to address the certified question. The appeal is dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
|
Sevier County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Harold L. Green
E2000-00616-CCA-R10-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Jason Beeler
W1999-01417-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from jury trial convictions for reckless homicide, felony murder, aggravated burglary, and two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping. In this appeal, the defendant alleges insufficient evidence, errors in admitting certain evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, improper instructions, and error in denying his writ of error coram nobis. Concluding that it was reversible error to not instruct on the lesser-included offenses of felony murder, we remand for a new trial on the felony murder count. We affirm the remaining convictions.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:William B. Acree |
Obion County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Deborah Graham & Denice Smith
E1999-02248-CCA-R3-CD
After a jury trial, a Cocke County jury found the Defendants, Deborah Graham and Denice Smith, guilty of the first degree murder of Aaron Smith. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced both Defendants to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. In this appeal as of right, the Defendants raise the following issues: 1) whether the trial court erred in not dismissing the indictments because of the State's failure to provide the Defendants with a speedy trial; 2) whether the trial court erred by allowing the State to decide not to consolidate Alexandro Rivera's case with the Defendants' case, because of a potential Bruton problem, without first granting the Defendants an opportunity to be heard on the issue; 3) whether the trial court erred in failing to sever Defendant Smith's case from Defendant Graham's case; 4) whether the trial court erred in consolidating Defendant Graham's case with Defendant Smith's case; and 5) whether the evidence was sufficient to convict each of the Defendants of first degree murder. After a thorough review of the evidence and the applicable law, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Rex H. Ogle |
Cocke County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State s. Ricky Eugene Cofer
E2000-00532-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant was indicted for aggravated robbery, and a Roane County jury found him guilty of the lesser offense of simple robbery, a Class C felony. The trial court sentenced him to six years as a Range II, multiple offender, to be served consecutively to a prior Anderson County sentence. In this appeal, defendant makes the following allegations: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) the jury foreman impermissibly interjected extraneous information into the jury deliberations; and (3) consecutive sentences were not warranted. Upon our review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:E. Eugene Eblen |
Roane County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Tinkham vs. Beasley
M1999-02809-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| White vs. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.
E1999-02023-SC-R11-CV
We granted permission to appeal in this case to address whether a private employer may be held liable for the negligent actions of an off-duty police officer who was hired by the employer for private security purposes. In the circuit court, the defendant employer moved to dismiss the plaintiffs' wrongful death action for failure to state a claim, and the motion was granted by the trial judge. The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal, holding that the actions of the off-duty officer were taken in furtherance of his official duties as a peace officer, and therefore, the defendant employer could not be held liable for the officer's negligent actions. After reviewing the complaint in this case, along with the applicable legal authority, we hold that the complaint does state a claim against the defendant employer for the negligence of the off-duty officer. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Knox County Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Supreme Court | 11/22/00 | |
| State vs. Garrison
E1997-00045-SC-R11-CD
The defendant, John C. Garrison, was convicted by a jury of solicitation to commit first degree murder. In this appeal, he raises two issues: (1) whether trial counsel's failure to communicate a plea bargain offer from the State is per se prejudicial to the extent necessary to satisfy the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984); and (2) whether the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to instruct the jury that the "request," as used in the statutory definition of the offense of solicitation, must be intentional. After a thorough consideration of the record and a full review of the authorities, we conclude that trial counsel's failure to communicate a plea bargain offer does not demonstrate, alone, prejudice sufficient to satisfy the second prong of Strickland. We conclude also that the trial court's omission of certain required language from the jury instruction constitutes harmless error. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is, therefore, reversed and the case is dismissed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Bledsoe County | Supreme Court | 11/22/00 | |
| Darrick Edwards vs. State
E1999-01204-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Darrick Edwards, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Because the petitioner was provided the effective assistance of counsel and knowingly and voluntarily entered his pleas of guilt to first degree murder, conspiracy to commit first degree murder, aggravated robbery, and conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, the judgment is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Martino vs. Dyer
M1999-02397-COA-R3-CV
The trial court granted the motion of an attorney seeking collection of a pro rata share of his fee from a hospital lien against his client's settlement. The effect of the trial court's order is to require the hospital to pay fees to an attorney it did not hire. We reverse the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:William M. Dender |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Tinkham vs. Beasley
M1999-02809-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Spike William Hedgecoth
E2000-00051-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:Lillie Ann Sells |
Cumberland County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Alvin Vonner vs. State
M2000-00566-CCA-R3-CD
The petitioner, Alvin Vonner, appeals the Hickman County Circuit Court's summary dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief and alleges that his 60 year second degree murder sentence has expired. Because the record fails to establish that the sentence has expired, we affirm the dismissal of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Stephen L.Carey vs. State
E2000-00847-CCA-R3-PC
This is a post-conviction appeal. The petitioner is currently serving life as an habitual criminal plus a consecutive 105 years for other offenses, all imposed in 1987. The petitioner timely filed three petitions for post-conviction relief challenging his guilty pleas for offenses occurring in 1969, 1981, and 1983, all of which were subsequently used to establish his habitual criminal status. The petitioner attempted to amend his petitions for post-conviction relief by challenging two of his 1987 convictions, but it was denied as untimely. All petitions were dismissed by the trial court after a hearing. In this appeal as a matter of right, the petitioner contends (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel and inadequate advice of his constitutional rights from the trial court, thereby rendering his guilty pleas involuntary and unknowing; and (2) the post-conviction court erroneously dismissed his amendment to the petition for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the post-conviction court correctly denied post-conviction relief.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/22/00 | |
| Thomas Smith vs. Arthur Johnson
W2000-00063-COA-R3-CV
This is a wrongful death case. A car crossed the center line and collided with a dump truck, causing the dump truck to strike and kill three pedestrians, including the plaintiff's wife and son. The plaintiff sued the driver of the car, the driver of the dump truck, and the company for which the dump truck driver was hauling asphalt. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the company, finding that the truck driver was an independent contractor. At trial, the jury found that the driver of the car was 100% at fault for the accident, and that the truck driver bore no fault in the accident. The plaintiffs did not move for a new trial. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the company, finding that the liability of the company would be derived from the fault of the truck driver in the operation or maintenance of his dump truck, and that the company could not be held liable where the jury found that the truck driver bore no fault in the accident.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Homer L. Evans
E2000-00069-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from the trial court's denial of alternative sentencing. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:E. Shayne Sexton |
Campbell County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Leon Hurd
E1999-01341-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| Dana Scott vs. Edward Sellers
W2000-00422-COA-R3-CV
This is a personal injury and wrongful death case arising from a collision between a pickup truck and a tractor trailer truck. The five-year-old son of plaintiffs Dana Scott and Shane Thurmon died as a result of the accident. The driver of the car was an "on call" employee of his father's business at the time. The plaintiffs sued the driver of the car and his father, alleging vicarious liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior and under the family purpose doctrine. Plaintiff Dana Scott also sued for consortium-type damages for the loss of her son. Although referring to it as a directed verdict, the trial court, pursuant to Rule 41.02 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, entered an involuntary dismissal in favor of the defendants on the vicarious liability issue, under both respondeat superior and the family purpose doctrine, and on the loss of filial consortium claim. The trial court awarded damages, inter alia, to Dana Scott for the wrongful death of her son and to Carl Fuhs for personal injuries based upon his negligent infliction of emotional distress claim. We hold the following: (1) employer is not vicariously liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for acts or omissions of "on call" employee when employee is not acting within the course and scope of his employment; (2) the requirements of the family purpose doctrine were met and defendant Donald Sellers, Sr. is vicariously liable under this theory; (3) parents may recover filial consortium damages in wrongful death actions for the death of their child; (4) the trial court's wrongful death award to Dana Scott was supported by the evidence; (5) Carl Fuhs sufficiently established a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress; and (6) the personal injury award to Carl Fuhs is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:George H. Brown |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Sean Imfeld
E2000-00094-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Mary Beth Leibowitz |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| Richard Stoner vs. Mary Stoner
W2000-01230-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a divorce between a couple with a long standing pre-marital relationship. Citing this relationship, the trial court classified two stock accounts as marital property and awarded Wife a portion of their funds. These accounts were pre-marital accounts of Husband. No marital funds were deposited in the accounts by either party and Wife had no interaction with the accounts. Under the circumstances of this case, the trial court's classification of this property as marital property amounts to recognition of a common-law marriage, and Tennessee does not recognize common-law marriages. As such, the trial court was incorrect in awarding funds from the accounts to Wife. The trial court correctly assigned pre-marital debt, divided the remainder of marital property, and awarded alimony in futuro and attorney's fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Ron E. Harmon |
Henry County | Court of Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Leon Hurd
E1999-01341-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Sonya Gosnell & Bronzo Gosnell, Jr .
E1999-00603-CCA-R3-CD
A jury convicted both defendants of second degree murder. Bronzo Gosnell and Sonya Gosnell were sentenced to 25 years and 20 years, respectively. In this appeal as a matter of right, both defendants challenge the introduction of recorded conversations made while detained in a police cruiser. Sonya Gosnell further challenges the introduction of certain pretrial statements, the administration of a polygraph examination, the denial of her motion for severance, and the denial of expert assistance. Bronzo Gosnell further challenges the trial court's limitation of his cross-examination of a witness and his maximum sentence of 25 years. Our review of the issues presented by the defendants reflects no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:James E. Beckner |
Greene County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Sean Imfeld
E2000-00094-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Mary Beth Leibowitz |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 | |
| State vs. Deandrade Phillips
E2000-00153-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from his conviction for selling less than one-half gram of cocaine, contesting the sufficiency of the evidence, the trial court's restrictions of his examinations of witnesses, the trial court's failure to require the state to elect the offense for which it sought a conviction, and the jury instructions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 11/21/00 |