Clement Bernard, M.D. v. Sumner Regional Health Systems
M2000-01478-COA-R3-CV
On or about March 26, 1999, the appellee Sumner Regional Health Systems, Inc. revoked appellant Clement F. Bernard, M.D. privileges to practice medicine at Sumner Regional Medical Center. Consequently, Dr. Bernard filed a complaint on March 29, 1999, alleging procurement of breach of contract and defamation. On February 9, 2000, Sumner Regional Health Systems filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds that Dr. Bernard could not establish viable claims for procurement of breach of contract or defamation. The trial court granted Sumner Regional's motion. On June 12, 2000, Dr. Bernard filed a Notice of Appeal and this litigation resulted.
Authoring Judge: Judge Don R. Ash
Originating Judge:Arthur E. Mcclellan |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 03/26/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles T. Sebree - Order
M2000-02810-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant was convicted upon pleas of guilty of the offenses of aggravated burglary, aggravated assault, and theft of property valued under $500. He received a sentence of five years for aggravated burglary consecutive to a sentence of five years for aggravated assault. A sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days was ordered served concurrently with the five year sentences. In this appeal, he maintains that his five-year sentence should be reduced to three years because the trial judge failed to consider the testimony of his girlfriend in mitigation.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
|
Montgomery County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/26/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. James Bradley Warner
M2001-01371-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of theft of property over $500, after being observed leaving a Wal-Mart store with merchandise for which he had not paid. In his appeal, he alleges that the proof of the value of the items was insufficient and that the trial court erred in ruling that certain of his prior convictions could be used for impeachment and in sentencing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Lee Russell |
Bedford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/26/02 | |
Ralph Richards v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.
M2000-01255-SC-WCM-CV
We granted review in this workers' compensation case to determine whether the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel erred in concluding that the evidence preponderated against the trial court's finding that the employee's injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. After reviewing the record and applicable authority, we conclude that the evidence did not preponderate against the trial court's finding that the employee's injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. We therefore reject the Panel's findings and conclusions and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:John W. Rollins |
Coffee County | Supreme Court | 03/26/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Brian Leiderman
M2001-01590-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted in January 2001 of aggravated assault and sentenced to four years in community corrections. Subsequently, while confined in the Grundy County Jail, he was charged with assaulting another inmate, which generated a probation revocation warrant. Following a hearing, the court revoked the community corrections sentence and ordered that he serve the sentence imposed for his aggravated assault conviction. He appealed the revocation, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to justify it and that his due process rights were violated because the trial court did not provide in its revocation order a written statement as to the evidence relied upon. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Buddy D. Perry |
Grundy County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/26/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Anthony L. Rogers
M2001-01729-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Anthony L. Rogers, was indicted for attempted second degree murder and two counts of aggravated assault. He pled guilty to one count of aggravated assault, a Class C felony, and the remaining counts were dismissed. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a Range II, multiple offender to eight years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. As his sole issue on appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in ordering his sentence to be served consecutively to a federal sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge John W. Rollins |
Coffee County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/26/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Thomas Dee Huskey - Dissenting
2002-00030-CCA-R10-CD
As acknowledged by the majority in its carefully considered opinion, trial judges are vested with broad discretionary powers in the conduct of a trial. Courts must monitor all attorney conduct and may direct a remedy if the performance impedes the orderly administration of justice. United States v. Dinitz, 538 F. 2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir. 1976). That authority necessarily includes the supervision of appointed counsel for indigent defendants. Moncier v. Ferrell, 990 S.W.2d 710
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Richard R. Baumgartner |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/26/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Tony Walker
W2001-00929-CCA-R3-CD
The Appellant, Tony Walker, appeals the verdict of a Fayette County jury finding him guilty of attempted aggravated robbery. On appeal, Walker raises the single issue of whether the evidence is sufficient to support his conviction. After a review of the record, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/25/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Robin Davis
W2000-03137-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of first degree premeditated murder and theft over $1000, receiving a life sentence for the murder conviction and a consecutive two-year sentence for the theft conviction. Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, he filed a timely notice of appeal to this court. In addition to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence as to his murder conviction, he argues that the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor to misstate law during voir dire; in not allowing defense counsel to question potential jurors about their personal experiences with crime; in allowing hearsay evidence to be presented at trial; in allowing the State to introduce evidence of uncharged crimes; and in allowing the prosecutor to make improper statements during closing argument. Based upon our review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge John P. Colton, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/25/02 | |
Jeffery A. Wright v. Johnston Coca-Cola & Dr. Pepper
E2000-02542-WC-R3-CV
The trial court found the plaintiff suffered a 5 percent permanent medical impairment as a result of an injury sustained while working for the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/25/02 | |
Jeffery A. Wright v. Johnston Coca-Cola & Dr. Pepper
E2000-02542-WC-R3-CV
The trial court found the plaintiff suffered a 5 percent permanent medical impairment as a result of an injury sustained while working for the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 03/25/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Lue J. Holcomb
W2001-00743-CCA-R3-CD
The appellant, Lue J. Holcomb, was convicted by a jury in the Shelby County Criminal Court of aggravated burglary. The trial court imposed a sentence of three and one-half years and ordered that six months of the sentence be served in confinement with the balance on probation. The appellant timely appealed, arguing that the evidence is not sufficient to support his conviction. After a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge J. C. Mclin |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/25/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Scott Allison
E2001-00248-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Gregory Scott Allison, appeals from the Blount County Circuit Court's revoking his probation that was ordered for his sentences for burglary and theft. The defendant contends that although the trial court may have been justified in finding that he violated the terms of his probation, it erred in sentencing him to confinement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/25/02 | |
Heirs of Neil Ellis v. Estate of Virgie Ellis
M1999-00897-SC-R11-CV
The issue in this case is whether property held in a tenancy by the entirety is subject to the 120-hour survival rule contained in section 31-3-120 of the Tennessee Uniform Simultaneous Death Act. Three days after her husband's death, Mrs. Ellis died of unrelated natural causes, and her will was admitted to probate. The husband's heirs sought to intervene in the probate proceeding, claiming that because Mrs. Ellis did not survive her husband for 120 hours, section 31-3-120 deems both to have died "simultaneously." Consequently, they argued, Tennessee Code Annotated section 31-3-104 authorized them to seek a one-half interest in the entireties property. The trial court denied the motion to intervene, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. On appeal to this Court, we hold that section 31-3-120 does not require one spouse to survive the other by 120 hours in order to obtain fee simple title to property formerly held by the entirety. We also hold that the General Assembly, in enacting section 31-3-120, did not intend to define the term "simultaneously" in section 31-3-104 as meaning "within 120 hours." Instead, we conclude that the legislature intended that this term should continue to receive its ordinary construction, meaning "at the same time." The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:David Loughry |
Rutherford County | Supreme Court | 03/25/02 | |
Corey L. Malone v. State of Tennessee
M2001-02133-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner originally pled guilty, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, to second degree murder and especially aggravated robbery for an effective sentence of twenty years. The petitioner filed a post-conviction relief petition, which was denied by the post-conviction court. In this appeal, the petitioner contends (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and (2) his guilty pleas were unknowingly and involuntarily entered. After review, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/22/02 | |
Mario Lambert v. Jack Morgan, Warden
M2002-00172-CCA-RM-PC
The Defendant, Mario Lambert, appealed as of right from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. This Court held that the trial court was without authority to sentence the Defendant as a Range I standard offender with a thirty percent release eligibility for the offense of second degree murder. We therefore concluded that, based on the record before us, the sentence imposed appeared to be an illegal sentence. We therefore reversed the judgment of the trial court dismissing the petition and remanded the case for further proceedings. See Mario Lambert v. Jack Morgan, Warden, No. M1999-02321-CCA-R3-PC, 2001 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 599 (Nashville, Aug. 7, 2001). On January 23, 2002, our supreme court remanded this case to us, directing us to reconsider our opinion in light of State v. Burkhart, 566 S.W.2d 871 (Tenn. 1978), and further directed us, on remand, to "clarify the action to be taken by the Criminal Court pursuant to the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals when the case is remanded to the trial court." We again reverse the judgment of the trial court summarily dismissing the habeas corpus petition and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/22/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. James Wesley Strombergh
E2001-00199-CCA-R3-CD
A Hamilton County jury found the Defendant guilty of third offense driving under the influence and imposed a fine of $10,000. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to eleven months and twenty-nine days' incarceration, ordered him to attend an alcohol rehabilitation program, and revoked his license for a period of five years. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant contests the sufficiency of the convicting evidence and argues that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his restricted driver's license. Although we conclude that sufficient evidence was presented at trial to support the Defendant's conviction, we conclude that evidence concerning the Defendant's restricted driver's license was improperly admitted at trial. We therefore reverse the Defendant's conviction and remand the case to the trial court for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Stephen M. Bevil |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/22/02 | |
Dawn Larsen Niceley v. James Jacob Niceley, IV
M2001-02182-COA-R3-CV
After a sixteen-year marriage and one child, Husband and Wife both filed for divorce. After hearing the evidence, the trial court fashioned a parenting plan which named Husband the primary residential parent during the school year and named Wife the primary residential parent during the summer and most holidays and school breaks; valued and divided the marital property; and awarded Wife attorney's fees as alimony in solido. We affirm the parenting plan and the distribution of marital property but reverse the award of attorney's fees because the trial court found Wife was not economically disadvantaged.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
Margarette Adair v. Vincent Scalf d/b/a V & T Topsoil
M2001-00677-COA-R3-CV
This is an action to abate a temporary nuisance of dust and noise attributable to the removal, processing and sale of topsoil ostensibly incidental to the development of real property owned by the defendant Scalf adjacent to the residence of the plaintiff, and for damages. A declaratory judgment against the Metro Government that it failed to enforce its zoning regulations was denied. Metro Government cross-claimed for declaratory relief that Mr. Scalf's removal, processing and sale of topsoil on residential property was forbidden by Ordinance. This relief was granted. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:Claudia C. Bonnyman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
Sonya Engstrom v. Todd Engstrom
M2001-01448-COA-R3-CV
The trial court divided the marital property of a divorcing couple, awarding the wife the marital home and the husband his leather business. The husband appealed, arguing that the property division was inequitable because the home was worth much more than the business. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
Wilson County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Walter Byers
E2001-00361-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Walter Byers, appeals from the Blount County Circuit Court's revocation of his community corrections sentence imposed upon his guilty plea to delivery of one-half gram or more of cocaine. The defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his community corrections sentence and sentencing him to confinement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
Darrel Howard v. State of Tennessee
W2001-00813-CCA-R3-PC
Pursuant to a plea agreement, the Petitioner pleaded guilty to nine counts of aggravated robbery and five counts of aggravated assault. The trial court sentenced the Petitioner to an effective sentence of twenty years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The Petitioner subsequently filed for post-conviction relief, claiming that his plea was constitutionally defective because he was inadequately represented at the time of the plea and because the plea was not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered. The post-conviction court denied relief. After review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Carolyn Wade Blackett |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
Robert Brown v. Dept of Labor and Workforce Development
M2001-01625-COA-R3-CV
The appellant suffered an injury while on the job. The Department of Labor and Workforce Development denied him workers' compensation benefits. Appellant sued the state for monetary damages. The trial court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
State of Tennessee v. Percy M. Cummings
W2001-01721-CCA-R3-CD
The Appellant, Percy M. Cummings, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of second degree murder and was sentenced to twenty-four years in the Department of Correction. On appeal, Cummings contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. After review, we find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Judge John P. Colton, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 03/21/02 | |
Columbia Advertising v. Ralph Isenhour
M2001-01627-COA-R3-CV
In this suit to collect payments for advertising services allegedly rendered to defendant pursuant to an oral agreement, the plaintiff failed to file an order setting the case for trial within the time period allowed by an agreed scheduling order. Shortly thereafter, the trial court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute. The plaintiff filed a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 60 motion seeking relief from the order of dismissal on the grounds that by mistake, counsel had failed to calendar the scheduling deadlines. The trial court found that plaintiff failed to offer an adequate basis to grant relief from the order of dismissal under Rule 60 and denied the motion. For the reasons set out in this opinion, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand this case for a trial on the merits.
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge James L. Weatherford
Originating Judge:Carol L. Mccoy |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 03/21/02 |