Please enter some keywords to search.
| Debra Cissom, et al vs. Al Miller, et al
E1999-02767-COA-R3-CV
The Plaintiffs sue the Defendants, alleging a nuisance created by chicken houses owned and operated by them in close proximity of the Defendants' property. The Trial Court found a temporary nuisance was created and that, although T.C.A. 44-18-102 was a complete bar to any claims the Plaintiffs might have insofar as three older chicken houses were concerned, is not a bar to their claim as to five new chicken houses. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant |
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 02/16/01 | |
| Jonathan Wilson vs. Sandra Wilson
E2000-01374-COA-R3-CV
This appeal from the Loudon County General Sessions Court questions whether the Trial Court erred in awarding a change of residential custody from Appellant, Sandra Kay Wilson to Appellee, Jonathan David Wilson. Ms. Wilson appeals the decision of the General Sessions Court. We affirm the decision of the Trial Court and remand for such further proceedings, if any, consistent with this opinion. We adjudge costs of the appeal against the Appellant, Ms. Sandra Kay Wilson and her surety.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:William H. Russell |
Loudon County | Court of Appeals | 02/16/01 | |
| State ex rel Debbie Whitfield vs. Michael Honeycutt
M1999-00914-COA-R3-CV
Appellant, who was married to the mother at the time of the child's birth, responded to a petition for contempt regarding past due child support with a request to determine paternity of the child. A paternity test is irrelevant in this case because even proof that he is not the child's father would not be a defense to contempt for failure to comply with a valid court order. We affirm the trial court's denial of the request.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Carol A. Catalano |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 02/16/01 | |
| Opinion With Judge Cain Specifically Concurring In Part Vi Thereof. P
M1998-00987-COA-R12-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
|
Court of Appeals | 02/16/01 | ||
| Ernest F. Phillips vs. County of Anderson, et al
E2000-01204-COA-R3-CV
The defendants, Anderson County and the City of Clinton, entered into an agreement to jointly finance the development of an industrial park to be owned and operated by the City. The plaintiff, Ernest F. Phillips, brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that the County's financing of a portion of the industrial park is illegal and unconstitutional and that the defendants violated various statutory requirements for the development of industrial parks. The trial court granted the defendants summary judgment. The plaintiff appeals, arguing: (1) that the County's use of bond proceeds to finance its portion of the industrial park's infrastructure costs constitutes a lending or giving of credit to or in aid of a corporation within the meaning of Article II, Section 29 of the Tennessee Constitution; (2) that the agreement between the County and the City is not legally sufficient under the Industrial Park Act; (3) that the County obtained a statutorily-required certificate of public purpose and necessity by fraud and misrepresentation; and (4) that the County's bond resolutions are fatally defective and call for prohibited expenditures. The City argues (a) that the plaintiff lacks standing to challenge the City's actions and (b) that the plaintiff's appeal is frivolous. We affirm the grant of summary judgment to the defendants but do not find the plaintiff's appeal to be frivolous.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:William E. Lantrip |
Anderson County | Court of Appeals | 02/16/01 | |
| M1998-0987-COA-R12-CV
M1998-0987-COA-R12-CV
|
Court of Appeals | 02/16/01 | ||
| Melanie Conger vs. Timothy Gowder, M.D.
E2000-01584-COA-R3-CV
In this medical malpractice case arising out of surgery, the trial court granted the defendant summary judgment on the plaintiff's claims of surgical negligence and lack of informed consent. The plaintiff appeals, arguing (1) that disputed issues of material fact exist that make summary judgment inappropriate and (2) that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiff to take the depositions of the defendant and another physician pending a hearing on the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Because we find that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the plaintiff to take the subject depositions, we vacate the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr. |
Anderson County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Terry Hahn vs. Thomas Hahn, et al
E2000-00330-COA-R3-CV
An intra-family business transaction which occurred nearly 30 years ago fomented this litigation involving an undisclosed interest in a hotel in Gatlinburg. The original parties are former spouses; the intervenors are their children. The complaint was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman
Originating Judge:Telford E. Forgerty, Jr. |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Town of Greeneville vs. John O. Hardin, et al
E2000-00827-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit by the Town of Greeneville to condemn a right-of-way for a sanitary sewer line over the property of John O. Hardin and Peggy Hardin, Defendants. The Hardins contested Greeneville's right to condemn in the Trial Court and, after an adverse ruling, appeal to this Court. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:John K. Wilson |
Greene County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Rick Richards vs. Traci Domalik
E2000-01882-COA-R3-CV
This is a tort action arising out of an accident involving a bicycle and an automobile. The plaintiff was riding his bicycle on the shoulder of the highway facing traffic. The driver of the automobile was to the plaintiff's left and was preparing to turn right out of the premises of a restaurant onto the highway. As the plaintiff moved to his left and started to pass in front of the automobile, the vehicles collided and the plaintiff was injured. The plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover compensatory damages. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, finding the plaintiff 75% at fault. The plaintiff appeals, asserting, inter alia, that the jury charge was erroneous and that this error warrants a new trial. We vacate the judgment below and remand for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:John K. Wilson |
Hawkins County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Tammy Kline, et al vs. Daniel Eyrich, et al
E2000-01890-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Wheeler A. Rosenbalm |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Bobby Everett, et al vs. Gordon McCall, M.D.
E2000-02012-COA-R3-CV
The complaint in this medical malpractice case was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff filed a Rule 56.07 Response to the motion, requesting additional time within which to take the defendant's deposition for the purpose, inter alia, of ascertaining his thought processes during the 27-day period he treated the plaintiff for a gastroenterological condition which ended in her death. The request for additional time was denied, and the motion for summary judgment was granted because the affidavit of the defendant was not countervailed. The judgment is reversed.
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman
Originating Judge:W. Dale Young |
Blount County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Tammy Kline, et al vs. Daniel Eyrich, et al
E2000-01890-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Wheeler A. Rosenbalm |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| City of Church Hill vs. Patrick Reynolds, III
E2000-01376-COA-R3-CV
Patrick H. Reynolds, III ("Defendant") was issued a Misdemeanor Citation alleging violations of multiple city ordinances of the City of Church Hill ("Plaintiff") over a one-month period. Defendant was found guilty in the Church Hill City Court of violating these ordinances. Defendant appealed to the Hawkins County Circuit Court which likewise found the Defendant guilty of violating the ordinances. The Circuit Court, however, found Defendant guilty of several violations on days for which the Defendant was tried by the City Court with no finding of guilt by the City Court. Because Defendant cannot be placed in double jeopardy for violations of these municipal ordinances, we reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court finding Defendant guilty for violations on days for which Defendant was tried by the City Court with no finding of guilt made by the City Court. We affirm the Circuit Court's determination with regard to the remaining violations.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:John K. Wilson |
Hawkins County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Donna Winstead, et al v.Claiborne County Hospital and Nursing Home
E2000-02214-COA-R3-CV
In this wrongful death action, the Trial Court held that defendant's nurses met the standard of care required of them in the treatment and care of the deceased, and dismissed the case. On appeal, we reverse and enter Judgment for damages.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Conrad E. Troutman, Jr. |
Claiborne County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| Tammy Kline, et al vs. Daniel Eyrich, et al
E2000-01890-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Wheeler A. Rosenbalm |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/15/01 | |
| In re: SJLL
E2000-02461-COA-R3-CV
In paternity action, defendant appeals the Trial Judge's refusal to grant T.R.C.P. Rule 60 relief on the grounds that plaintiff's non-suit was improper, and as a result defendant was denied his right to a jury trial. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Joseph M. Ayers |
Campbell County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Carolyn Attaway vs. Denver Attaway
E2000-01338-COA-R3-CV
In this action to collect child support ordered in the State of Georgia, the Trial Court Ordered the foreign judgment registered in the Circuit Court, allowed a credit for Social Security payments, and denied the defense of statute of limitations. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Jacqueline E. Schulten |
Hamilton County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| J.W. Hargrove, et al vs. Larry Carlton, et al
M2000-00250-COA-R3-CV
After the defendant landowners placed gates across a roadway that ran through their land, some adjoining landowners filed suit to have the gates removed. The plaintiffs argued that the roadway was a public road, or in the alternative that they had acquired prescriptive rights to use it. The trial court ruled for the defendants. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| In Re: JJC
E2000-01223-COA-R3-CV
The Trial Court terminated the father's parental rights. Father argued below and on appeal, that the part of the UCCJA which gave the court jurisdiction of the matter is unconstitutional. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Daryl R. Fansler |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Deborah Harvey vs. Felipa Covington, d/b/a Choice Corporate Training Int'l.
M2000-01184-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a business dispute between the parties. Businesswoman and Investor signed letter of intent to create limited liability company. Business then began operation. Thereafter, several operational disputes arose between the parties, as well as disputes over Businesswoman's use of Business funds. The trial court determined that Businesswoman had defrauded Investor of invested funds and awarded Investor those funds. Investor was also awarded back pay promised by Businesswoman through Business. We find that a partnership agreement existed between the parties and reverse the trial court's judgment. The case is remanded for rescission of the partnership on the basis that it was created under fraudulent circumstances. The trial court's decision to deny attorney's fees requested by Businesswoman is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| State, ex rel Kandy Bissonette, vs. Joseph Marland, III, In Re: KRB
E2000-02089-COA-R3-CV
In this action to establish paternity, the Trial Court dismissed the action on the grounds that a previous action against the same defendant had been dismissed, and the savings statute had run. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Carey E. Garrett |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Dept. of Children's Services vs. Dorothy Hopson
E2000-01606-COA-R3-CV
Dorothy Hopson appeals a determination that her parental rights should be terminated as to her two daughters upon the grounds that the Trial Court was in error in allowing into evidence statements made by the children to third parties; in finding that the evidence was clear and convincing that she had committed child abuse as to her children; and in finding that termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of the children. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance |
Grainger County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| First Citizens Bank of Cleveland vs. Carol Cross
E2000-01325-COA-R3-CV
This is the second time that this case has been before us on appeal. The case originated as a suit on two promissory notes executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff and secured by deeds of trust on real property owned by the defendant. The defendant filed a pleading incorporating a counterclaim, and a third-party complaint against one of the plaintiff's employees, which pleading alleges that the plaintiff, through its employee, breached its undertaking to arrange for additional insurance coverage on the mortgaged property. On the first appeal, this Court held that the trial court erred in denying the defendant's request for a jury trial. On remand, the plaintiff and the third-party defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground that the parol evidence rule bars consideration of the defendant's claim that the plaintiff, through its employee, agreed to contact the agent for the insurance company and arrange for additional insurance on the mortgaged property. The trial court granted the movants summary judgment and, upon confirmation of a Master's report as to the amounts due under the notes, entered a judgment against the defendant. The defendant appeals. We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff on the promissory notes; however, we vacate the grant of summary judgment as to the defendant's counterclaim and third-party complaint.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant |
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 | |
| Mason Manor Apartments v. Tawana Anthony
W2002-01769-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Appeals | 02/14/01 |