APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
01C01-9608-CR-00347

01C01-9608-CR-00347

Originating Judge:Ann Lacy Johns
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
Debra Tipton vs. John Harris

02A01-9706-CV-00114
Shelby County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
Ronnie Bradfield vs. Stephanie Cole, et al

02A01-9707-CV-00171

Originating Judge:R. Lee Moore Jr.
Lake County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
Greenback vs. Loudon

03A01-9706-CV-00207

Originating Judge:Russell E. Simmons, Jr.
Loudon County Court of Appeals 02/26/98
State vs. Gabriel Blackman

02C01-9704-CC-00135

Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
McNairy County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
01C01-9512-CR-00414

01C01-9512-CR-00414
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/26/98
State vs. Crain

03C01-9604-CC-00149
Unicoi County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Alfonzo Chalmers

W2000-00440-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from his conviction for first degree premeditated murder. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court erred by impermissibly commenting on the evidence in violation of article VI, section 9 of the Constitution of Tennessee. We affirm the judgment of conviction.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Jones

03C01-9701-CR-00016

Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer
Hamilton County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State vs. Millsaps

03C01-9601-CC-00044
Monroe County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
03C01-9608-CR-00309

03C01-9608-CR-00309

Originating Judge:Frank L. Slaughter
Sullivan County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/25/98
State of Tennessee v. James Henderson Dellinger &Amp; Gary

E1997-00196-CCA-R3-DD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Blount County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
State vs. Chloe Clark

01C01-9704-CC-00134

Originating Judge:Jim T. Hamilton
Maury County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
State vs. McConnell

03C01-9604-CC-00148
Hamblen County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Deborah Dunn

01S01-9707-CH-00160
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. This declaratory judgment action likely created an interest that otherwise might not have existed or, perhaps, might not have manifested itself. The employer filed the action alleging that its employee reported that she experienced pain in her neck on August 17, 1995, that she was successfully treated and returned to work on September 12, 1995, that her medical expenses had been paid, and that the plaintiff [employer] should be "discharged from responsibility to defendant [employee]." A counter-claim followed in course, with the employee alleging that her neck injury resulted in temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, permanent impairment and disability, together with the incurrence of medical expenses. The trial court found the issues in favor of the employee and awarded her benefits based upon a twelve and one-half percent disability to her whole body, thus entitling her to a recovery of $2,793.5 to be paid in a lump sum. By separate order the employee was awarded $6. discretionary costs. The propriety of these awards is questioned on appeal. Our review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. T.C.A. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The claimant is 37 years old, with limited marketable skills. She was initially employed in 1991 or 1992, according to her testimony. In 1992 "something happened to my neck" while loading a spool of wire. Two or three
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. J. Richard Mcgregor
Warren County Workers Compensation Panel 02/24/98
State vs. Winn

03C01-9702-CR-00081

Originating Judge:James E. Beckner
Hamblen County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
State vs. Willliam Trotter .

01C01-9701-CR-00019

Originating Judge:Ann Lacy Johns
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
Chad Swatzell vs. State

01C01-9604-CC-00154
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
State vs. Robert Bitner

02C01-9705-CC-00177

Originating Judge:C. Creed Mcginley
Carroll County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
Michael Lee Proffit v. Superior Industries, Inc.

03S01-9701-CH-00008.
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employer has appealed from an adverse judgment, contending the award of permanent partial disability benefits is excessive. The employee contends the appeal is frivolous. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The employee or claimant, Proffitt, is 37 years old with a fifth grade education and experience as a mason's helper, a painter, a farm worker and a sawmill operator. He began working for the employer in 1993 as a janitor. On April 25, 1994, he was assisting another worker to empty a heavy trash barrel when he felt a sudden pulling sensation in his back. He continues to have sharp pain in his back and numbness in his back and legs. He no longer works for Superior Industries. Four medical doctors testified at the trial. Dr. Henry J. Williams treated the claimant in the emergency room shortly after the accident and diagnosed lumbar strain. The doctor first assigned no permanent impairment. After further visits, however, he assessed a permanent impairment of one percent to the body as a whole. Dr. Matthew Wood, Jr. examined the claimant and found no permanent impairment. Dr. Fred Killefer agreed with Dr. Wood. Dr. Calvin J. Johnson examined the claimant and found objective evidence of injury in the form of muscle spasm. He diagnosed chronic low back syndrome with facet arthritis and assessed ten percent permanent impairment to the whole body. He restricted the claimant from repetitively bending, stooping, squatting or lifting more than twenty pounds. The trial judge awarded permanent partial disabilitybenefits on the basis of twenty-five percent to the body as a whole. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(2). Once the causation and permanency of an injury have been 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. G. Richard Johnson,
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 02/24/98
State vs. Leon Woodlee

01C01-9611-CC-00465
Warren County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
State vs. Donald Long

02C01-9610-CC-00362

Originating Judge:John Franklin Murchison
Henderson County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
State vs. Jeffery Casey

02C01-9701-CC-00015

Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn
Decatur County Court of Criminal Appeals 02/24/98
Joseph D. Lewis v. The Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co., et al.

01S01-9702-CV-00036
Authoring Judge: William S. Russell, Retired Judge
Originating Judge:Hon.
Lewis County Workers Compensation Panel 02/24/98
Ulyes Williams v. City of Knoxville

03S01-9706-CV-00070
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The City of Knoxville contends (1) the claim is barred by the statute of limitations and (2) the trial court erred in not accepting the opinion testimony of the treating physician. The claimant contends the trial court erred in allowing credit for overpaid temporary total disability benefits. The panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The claimant, Williams, has less than an eighth grade education, little or no reading or writing skills and no vocational training. He was 39 years old at the time of the trial. He has worked for the city since about 1988, first as a laborer and later as tractor-mower operator. In 1992, he suffered a compensable back injury, was temporarily disabled and returned to work until September 18, 1995, when he re-injured his back at work. Back surgery was performed on or about November 18, 1995 and he returned to work around March 1, 1996 for a few weeks, quit because of post-surgical problems, then returned again around July 1, 1996. He has since been terminated. This civil action was commenced on March 29, 1996. The defendant filed and served its answer on April 26, 1996, but did not aver therein that the claim was barred by any statute of limitations. That a claim is so barred is an affirmative defense and the facts constituting such defense must be set forth in short and plain terms in a defendant's answer. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 8.3. Moreover, the record fails to establish that the claimant had fair notice of the employer's intention to assert the statute of limitations as a defense. The defense was thus waived. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.8. Additionally, the panel finds the defense to be without merit. The first issue is resolved in favor of the appellee. As the employer insists, citing Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 83 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991), the trial judge must choose which of conflicting expert medical opinions to accept. We are aware of no rule which 2
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Dale C. Workman
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 02/24/98