Clinton Lien v. Nashville and Davidson County M2002-00721-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
Chief Emmett H. Turner, of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County Police Department, discharged Appellant from employment as a police officer for certain violations of various rules and regulations. The officer appealed his discharge and, after a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge reduced his penalty to a thirty day suspension. The appeal was further heard before the Civil Service Commission, which reversed the ALJ and upheld the dismissal of the officer. The Chancery Court of Davidson County upheld the action of the Civil Service Commission. The officer appeals, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Burress vs. Sanders M1999-00210-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Graham
Sequatchie
Court of Appeals
Gregory Scott Spooner vs. State E2004-02160-CCA-R3-HC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner
The petitioner, Gregory Scott Spooner, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The state has filed a motion requesting that this court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The petition fails to establish a cognizable claim for habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, the state's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Hancock
Court of Criminal Appeals
Melissa Kornblee (Jaramillo) vs. Kevin Richard Kornblee M2000-00379-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Thomas E. Gray
In this post-divorce proceeding, Melissa Danise Foster Kornblee (Jaramillo) appeals the trial court's actions in ordering mental health counseling and treatment of the parties' minor children by a court appointed professional, declining to allow her to relocate with the minor children to Wyoming, allowing Father unsupervised visitation with the children, and awarding Father attorney's fees in defending her motion to suspend unsupervised visitation. We affirm the trial court.
In Re: Estate of George C. Vincent E2001-03035-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White
In this will construction case, we address the question of whether or not the doctrine of exoneration applies to a mortgage on real property passing by right of survivorship where the decedent's will directed that his personal representative pay all his "just debts." We find that the general direction to pay "just debts" is not sufficient to require that the estate pay the remaining balance on the mortgage of non-probate property. Furthermore, additional language in the will regarding the payment of installment debts is not sufficient to indicate that the testator intended to include mortgages of non-probate property where the testator's will specified only one beneficiary and did not mention either the property held by joint tenancy or the joint tenant.
State vs. Bruce Reliford W1999-00826-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley
This direct appeal follows dismissal of the appellant's motion at the trial level for a "Correction/Reduction" of his sentences. The appellant is currently serving an effective sentence of life without parole after pleading guilty in 1995 to the offenses of first degree murder, two counts of aggravated robbery and one count of aggravated assault. He argues that his sentences are illegal and are subject to correction because (1) his life sentence is in direct contravention of statutory authority and (2) his negotiated plea agreement with the State is incapable of specific performance. The indictment alleges that these offenses occurred on December 24, 1992. On this date, life without the possibility of parole was not an available sentencing option for first degree murder. Although we find that appellate review of a "Motion for Correction or Reduction" of a sentence is not available, as of right, under Tenn. R. App. P. 3(b), nonetheless, we hold that review is available under the common law writ of certiorari. Upon review of the presented issues, we conclude that the trial court was without authority to impose a sentence of life without the possibility of parole for first degree murder. This conviction and sentence is vacated. Because the appellant's plea agreement encompassed all of his convictions and resulting sentences, we find it necessary upon vacating his first degree murder conviction to also vacate his convictions and sentences for aggravated robbery and aggravated assault. This case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Tiffany Senn v. Romando Haynes M2002-01519-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Donna A. Scott
Tiffany T. Senn (Williams) appeals the action of the Juvenile Court of Rutherford County, changing the primary residential custody of her minor child from Tiffany Senn to the biological father of the child, Romando Haynes. We affirm the action of the trial court.
Rutherford
Court of Appeals
State vs. Stephen Stamps W1999-01716-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley
Henry
Court of Criminal Appeals
Leighann M. Gullett v. Michael J. Hopkins M2003-02086-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins
This is a post-divorce change of custody proceeding wherein the trial court found no substantial change of circumstances and denied the Petition. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
State vs. Audrey Black E1999-01391-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
Blount
Court of Criminal Appeals
DeShayne Neal v. Jerry Neal M2003-02703-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Gerald L. Ewell, Sr.
This is an appeal from the chancery court order refusing to modify the parties' divorce decree and permanent parenting plan. Mother filed a Petition to Modify, and Father filed an Answer and Counter Petition also requesting modification. The Chancellor dismissed both the Petition and Counter Petition finding that there had not been sufficient change in circumstances since the initial entry of the divorce decree to justify modification. Upon review of the Permanent Parenting Plan and Final Decree of the Chancery Court, we find that this Permanent Parenting Plan and the judge's approval of such plan do not meet the requirements of Tennessee law. As such, the Permanent Parenting Plan is vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial court.
State vs. Frederick Sledge W2001-02402-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.
The defendant was convicted of first degree murder and especially aggravated robbery and was originally sentenced to death and twenty years, respectively. The trial court ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. On appeal, this court affirmed both convictions but reversed the death sentence and remanded it for resentencing. On remand, the defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment after a new sentencing hearing. The life sentence was ordered to be served consecutively to the original twenty-year sentence for especially aggravated robbery. The only issue raised on this appeal is whether, on remand, the trial court erred by not reconsidering the issue of consecutive sentencing when resentencing the defendant for the murder conviction. We affirm the sentence as imposed on remand by the trial court.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Frederick Sledge W2001-02402-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.
The defendant was convicted of first degree murder and especially aggravated robbery and was originally sentenced to death and twenty years, respectively. The trial court ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. On appeal, this court affirmed both convictions but reversed the death sentence and remanded it for resentencing. On remand, the defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment after a new sentencing hearing. The life sentence was ordered to be served consecutively to the original twenty-year sentence for especially aggravated robbery. The only issue raised on this appeal is whether, on remand, the trial court erred by not reconsidering the issue of consecutive sentencing when resentencing the defendant for the murder conviction. We affirm the sentence as imposed on remand by the trial court.
