Musgrove vs. Coffey
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9602-CH-00054
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
James v. Doramus
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Forbes vs. Wilson Co. Emergency
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Forbes vs. Wilson Co. Emergency
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Craig v. Gabbert
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9504-CV-00068
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9505-CH-00104
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9507-CH-00154
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9508-CH-00164
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9510-CV-00217
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9504-CV-00095
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9506-CH-00128
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-CV-00038
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-CV-00038
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9602-CV-00078
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9511-CH-00501
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9603-CH-00125
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9504-CH-00080
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Harold Wayne Gibson, and wife, Sylvia Gibson, v. Kit G. McGlothlin, D/B/A Kit McGlothlin Builders, Inc., et al.
This is an action for damages for breach of a construction contract and of an implied warranty of good workmanship and materials and for negligent construction. |
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Herman Davis and wife, Darnell Davis, v. Paul A. Hatcher, Sr., M.D.
This malpractice action was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. It arose from a routine prostate resection which went awry, resulting in adverse consequences to the plaintiff. A device referred to as a resectoscope manufactured by the Circon ACMI Ohio Manufacturing Company,1 malfunctioned while being used by and under the control of the defendant, Dr. Paul Hatcher [hereafter, the “defendant”]. It is not disputed that a portion of the penis of the plaintiff, Herman |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Herman Davis and wife, Darnell Davis, v. Paul A. Hatcher, Sr., M.D.
This malpractice action was dismissed on motion for summary judgment. It arose from a routine prostate resection which went awry, resulting in adverse consequences to the plaintiff. A device referred to as a resectoscope manufactured by the Circon ACMI Ohio Manufacturing Company,1 malfunctioned while being used by and under the control of the defendant, Dr. Paul Hatcher [hereafter, the “defendant”]. It is not disputed that a portion of the penis of the plaintiff, Herman Davis [hereafter, “plaintiff”], was either chemically, thermally or electrically burned away, with disastrous results unnecessary here to be recounted. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
William Bland and Lena Bland, v. Allstate Insurance Company
This is a suit brought by William Bland (Bland) against Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) for breach of contract for failure to pay a claim under his homeowner’s insurance policy. At trial, the jury found for Bland and awarded him damages under the insurance contract for the loss of his home and its contents due to a fire. Allstate argued at trial that material misrepresentations on the application, as a matter of law, warranted Allstate’s decision to void Bland’s policy ab initio. Allstate appeals the denial of its motion for directed verdict and alleges error in a number of the jury instructions. We affirm the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Henry County Medical Center, v. Henry Gronski, M.D.
This is a breach of contract action brought by Henry County Medical Center (HCMC) against Henry Gronski, M.D. (Gronski). In response, Gronski admitted the amounts owed to HCMC under the contract but claimed that he was owed a larger amount as set-off. The trial court awarded HCMC a judgment of $44,900.40 on the contract and awarded Gronski $56,204 as set-off. The court also ordered HCMC to pay Gronski's attorney's fees and accountant fees. HCMC appeals the court’s award of set-off to Gronski as well as the award of attorney’s and accountant fees. We affirm the trial court on all issues. |
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
Eldred L. Reid v. Jerry Stover and Charles Noles
Plaintiff, Eldred Reid, is a prisoner currently incarcerated at the Northwest 2 Correctional Center in Tiptonville, Tennessee. Plaintiff brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that various officials at the correctional center violated his constitutional rights. |
Lake | Court of Appeals |