Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Richard Walker
02C01-9901-CR-00006
Originating Judge:Bernie Weinman |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/25/99 | |
| State vs. Christopher Love
02C01-9809-CR-00281
Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/25/99 | |
| State vs. Fowler
01S01-9810-CC-00185
|
Coffee County | Supreme Court | 10/25/99 | |
| State vs. John Melson
03C01-9712-CC-00531
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/25/99 | |
| State vs. Ben Ray
02C01-9901-CC-00021
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn |
Henry County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/25/99 | |
| State vs. David Eaton
02C01-9802-CR-00043
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/25/99 | ||
| State vs. Fowler
01S01-9810-CC-00185
Originating Judge:John W. Rollins |
Coffee County | Supreme Court | 10/25/99 | |
| Overnite Transportation Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 480, et al.
M2002-02116-SC-R11-CV
We granted this appeal to determine 1) whether a trial court's order declining to hold an alleged contemnor in civil contempt may be appealed; 2) whether compensatory damages for civil contempt are available pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-9-105 (1980 & 2000) from a contemnor who commits an act forbidden by a trial court's order; and, if so, 3) whether those damages may be recovered if the violation is not ongoing at the time of the hearing. We answer these questions in the affirmative. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Ellen H. Lyle |
Davidson County | Supreme Court | 10/24/99 | |
| 01C01-9705-CC-00200
01C01-9705-CC-00200
Originating Judge:James L. Weatherford |
Maury County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/22/99 | |
| State vs.John Thomas Heflin
01C01-9809-CC-00380
Originating Judge:Thomas T. Woodall |
Coffee County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/22/99 | |
| Geraldine Garrett v. Town of Livingston, Tn & Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.
01S01-9805-CV-00098
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:Hon. John J. Maddux, Jr. |
Overton County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/22/99 | |
| 01C01-9711-CC-
01C01-9711-CC-
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/22/99 | ||
| State vs. Bruce Holder
01C01-9902-CR-00054
|
Sumner County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/22/99 | |
| 01C01-9903-CC-00105
01C01-9903-CC-00105
|
Maury County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/22/99 | |
| 01C01-9807-CC-00292
01C01-9807-CC-00292
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/22/99 | |
| State vs. Johnny Moffitt
02C01-9904-CC-00142
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn |
Henderson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/21/99 | |
| Curtis Watkins v. State of Tennessee
02C01-9808-CR-00236
The Petitioner, Curtis W atkins, appeals the order of the Shelby County Criminal Court denying his petition for post-conviction relief. The Petitioner pled guilty to aggravated rape in 1981 and received a sentence of twenty (20) years. In 1992, he filed the present petition alleging that, (1) his guilty plea was involuntary because he was not ad vised of his right again st self-incrimination, and (2) that he received ine ffective assistance of counsel.1 The trial court denied the petition after an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough re view of the record before this Court, we affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Originating Judge:Judge Carolyn Wade Blackett |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/21/99 | |
| In the Matter of: Matthew L. Powell
03A01-9908-CR-00272
|
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 10/21/99 | |
| State vs. Maurice Shaw
02C01-9811-CC-00363
Originating Judge:Joseph H. Walker, III |
Tipton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/21/99 | |
| State vs. Bufford Barrett
02C01-9901-CC-00023
Originating Judge:Thomas T. Woodall |
McNairy County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/21/99 | |
| State vs. William R. Begley, III
03C01-9810-CR-00359
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/20/99 | |
| Kenneth Kerr v. Municipal Corp.
03S01-9803-CV-00032
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the findings, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2); Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The application of this standard requires this Court to weigh in more depth the factual findings and conclusions of the trial court in a workers' compensation case. See Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc., 746 S.W.2d 452, 456 (Tenn. 1988). The trial judge entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and fixed his recovery at 25 percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The defendant says the evidence preponderates against the judgment. We agree with the defendant and reverse the judgment and dismiss this case. On July 11, 1994, the plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident while in the course of his employment with the defendant. The plaintiff was treated by Dr. Archer W. Bishop, Jr., an orthopedic surgeon, whose report was submitted as medical evidence in the case. Dr. Bishop's report, in essence, shows that the plaintiff had some degenerative disc disease and that he had some temporary symptoms as a result of the accident but no permanent effects therefrom. Dr. Bishop found the plaintiff had a five percent medical impairment as a result of the degenerative disc disease but no impairment as a result of the accident. The plaintiff testified concerning pain and difficulties which he was having. This is called greatly into question by Dr. Bishop's findings concerning pain: He states that he is having severe pain in his back. He even described pain in his hair, in his neck and in his skin. He seems to have complaints that outweigh his findings. Because of the complaints of pain, Dr. Bishop had an MRI done on the plaintiff. This showed no support for the plaintiff's complaints of pain. The plaintiff sought the opinion of Dr. Wade H. Penny, III, an orthopedic surgeon. Dr. Penny's report is not enlightening. It is somewhat vague as to the 2
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Rex Henry Ogle, |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/20/99 | |
| State vs. Paris A. Weaver
03C01-9902-CR-00052
Originating Judge:Stephen M. Bevil |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 10/20/99 | |
| Carl Loving v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.
03S01-9805-CH-00050
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff suffered a back injury in a job-related accident on November 4, 1996. The contested issue was the extent of permanent disability, which the Chancellor found was 65 percent to the whole body. The defendant disagrees, appeals, and presents the issues of excessiveness and the allowance of discretionary costs for review, which is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2); Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The plaintiff, age 48, has been married 26 years, is a high school graduate, and has worked as a car salesman most of his adult life. But on November 4, 1996, he was otherwise employed at a job which required heavy lifting. While lifting a barrel filled with liquid weighing about 6 pounds, he injured his lower back, which eventually required surgery. He was released to return to work and "just sat around answering the telephone" for two weeks before he was terminated as unable to do the required work. He testified that he has looked for work elsewhere, but that "it's hard to get a job when you can't hardly do anything." He was initially seen by Dr. Steven Sanders, a neurological surgeon, on November 11, 1996. An MRI revealed a herniated disc. Conservative treatment proved ineffective, and Dr. Sanders performed a diskectomy on November 3, 1996. Based on the AMA Guidelines, he opined that the plaintiff had a ten percent impairment, and imposed permanent lifting restrictions. 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Billy J. White, |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/20/99 | |
| Diane Watters vs. William Watters
02A01-9810-CH-00306
Originating Judge:Floyd Peete, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 10/19/99 |