APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
State of Tennessee v. Robert Morrow

E2000-02796-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant entered a best-interest guilty plea in the Cocke County Criminal Court to one count of especially aggravated kidnapping, two counts of aggravated rape, and one count of criminal exposure to HIV. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a Range I standard offender to six years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction for the criminal exposure to HIV conviction, as a violent offender to 24 years incarceration for the especially aggravated kidnapping conviction, as a violent offender to 24 years incarceration for one of the aggravated rape convictions, and as a multiple rapist to 24 years incarceration for the other aggravated rape conviction. The trial court ordered consecutive service of the sentences for an effective sentence of 78 years incarceration.  On appeal, the defendant takes issue with the length of the sentences and the consecutive service imposed. Based upon our review, we affirm the sentences imposed.

Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Robert E. Cupp
Cocke County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/18/01
Mitzi Lyne vs. George Price

W2000-00870-COA-R3-CV
This is an intentional interference with employment case. An at-will employee worked as a secretary for a university's athletic department. The employee was discharged when she allegedly refused to cooperate with her supervisor and remain silent about conduct she believed was illegal and in violation of the university's policies. The employee filed a lawsuit against, among others, her former supervisor in both his individual and his official capacities for intentional interference with her employment with the university. The trial court dismissed the complaint in its entirety. The employee appeals the dismissal of the claims against the former supervisor in his individual capacity. We reverse, finding that the employee's complaint states a cause of action based on the allegations that the employee's supervisor procured her discharge to further his own personal interests and for reasons unrelated to furthering the interests of the university.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:George H. Brown
Shelby County Court of Appeals 09/18/01
Dean Kinningham vs. State of TN

M2001-00495-COA-R3-CV
Appellant was an inmate housed at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, having been transferred to this secure facility after overpowering a guard and forcibly escaping confinement at Claiborne County Jail. He was convicted and sentences imposed upon him for aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, possession of a Schedule II controlled substance for sale, possession of a handgun by convicted felon and felony escape, these sentences being imposed on August 3, 1999. Appellant was assaulted by a fellow inmate and filed claim against the State for alleged negligent custody or control of persons resulting in the inmate attack. The Claims Commission rendered summary judgment for the State and we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Claiborne County Court of Appeals 09/18/01
State of Tennessee v. William A. Tansil

M2000-02940-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, William A. Tansil, appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), third offense, for which he received a sentence of eleven months, twenty-nine days, with all but one hundred fifty days being suspended. He contends that the trial court erred in finding him to be a third-time offender, arguing that the judgment for one of his prior convictions is void on its face. We affirm the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Judge Timothy L. Easter
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/18/01
Roger Wayne Braden v. State of Tennessee

E2000-03072-CCA-R3-PC

On April 29, 1999, the petitioner's status on community corrections was revoked and he was resentenced. On May 15, 2000, he filed a pro se post-conviction relief petition. The issue is whether the petition is time-barred by the Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-30-202. Because the revocation and resentencing became final thirty days after its entry, which was May 29, 1999, as the State concedes, and we agree, the petition was timely filed. We reverse the summary dismissal of the petition and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Douglas A. Meyer
Hamilton County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/18/01
State of Tennessee v. Ronnie D. Denson

M2000-02583-CCA-R3-CD

he defendant pled guilty to aggravated assault with an agreed four-year sentence, and the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. The trial court denied the defendant any alternative sentence and ordered that the defendant serve his sentence in the Department of Correction. The defendant appeals the trial court's judgment denying him an alternative sentence. After review, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Judge Robert E. Burch
Cheatham County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/18/01
State of Tennessee v. Robert G. Bean

M2000-02797-CCA-R3-CD

The appellant, Robert G. Bean, challenges his conviction in the Williamson County Circuit Court of one count of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), third offense. He presents the following issues for our determination: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant's challenge for cause of prospective juror Thelma Woodard; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant's motion to suppress the State's use at trial of the videotape of the traffic stop of the appellant's vehicle; (3) whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on adult driving while impaired as a lesser-included offense of driving under the influence; and (4) whether the trial court erred in using the appellant's 1996 conviction of DUI to enhance the appellant's sentence. Following a thorough review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Judge Timothy L. Easter
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/18/01
Eugene L. Tindell v. Travelers Insurance Company

E2000-01488-WC-R3-CV
The trial judge found the plaintiff had failed to show he had suffered a compensable injury and dismissed the petition.
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:Richard R. Vance, Judge
Knox County Workers Compensation Panel 09/18/01
Mitchell Anderson vs. Dr. Ken Warren

W2000-02649-COA-R3-CV
Buyers of home sued sellers for damages resulting from numerous defects in home not disclosed to buyers and in direct contradiction of the representations made about the property. The trial court found sellers had fraudulently misrepresented the condition of the property and awarded damages. Sellers appeal. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:George R. Ellis
Gibson County Court of Appeals 09/18/01
John E. Gaines vs. TN Dept. of Correction

M2001-00268-COA-R3-CV
John E. Gaines is an inmate in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction and while in custody at Middle Tennessee Correctional Complex Annex was a work release inmate. He was charged with violation of T.D.O.C. policy for failure to timely appear at his job site pickup station following the workday of May 10, 2000. Upon conviction in prison disciplinary proceedings and exhaustion of appellate remedies within the Tennessee Department of Correction, he filed, in the Chancery Court for Davidson County, a petition for a writ of common law certiorari. The Chancellor sustained a motion to dismiss under T.R.C.P. 12(6) and, upon consideration of the record, we affirm the judgment of the Chancellor.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/18/01
Joan Schmitt vs. James Smith

W2000-01726-COA-R3-CV
This dispute arises from an action to enforce an attorney's lien in a divorce action. Appellant contends that a separate suit is required to enforce the lien, and, further, that the lien was lost through the attorney's failure to have it noted in the final judgment. Appellant also submits that the trial court erred in issuing injunctive relief without notice, hearing or bond against proceeds of marital property against which the lien was filed. We hold that the attorney's lien was lost due to failure to note it in the final judgment or by a timely Rule 59.04 motion to alter or amend the judgment. We further hold that the Rule 65.07 exception to the requirements of injunctive relief in some domestic relations cases does not apply to the case at bar, where, although the original suit was a divorce action, the issue presented for resolution is essentially based on contract.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:George H. Brown
Shelby County Court of Appeals 09/18/01
April Price vs. Kenneth Price

W2000-01471-COA-R3-CV
This appeal follows a divorce action in which the trial court awarded custody of the parties' two minor children to the father. The mother appeals only the award of custody. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris
Madison County Court of Appeals 09/18/01
William Eaton vs. Elnora Eaton

W2001-00576-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the sale of the plaintiff's land to the defendant. The plaintiff's attorney in fact, pursuant to a valid durable power of attorney, sold the land to the defendant. The trial court held that the transaction between the attorney in fact and the defendant was fair, valid and binding as to the plaintiff. The plaintiff, by next friend, appeals the ruling of the trial court. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Dewey C. Whitenton
Tipton County Court of Appeals 09/17/01
Tn Farmers Mutual vs. Ford Motor

W2001-00046-COA-R3-CV
This is a consolidated appeal of three products liability cases. Three vehicles manufactured by the defendant automobile company were destroyed by spontaneous combustion, allegedly caused by a defective steering column. No personal injuries resulted from the fires, and no other property was damaged. The plaintiff insurance company, which insured the cars, paid the owners the value of the vehicles. The insurance company, as subrogee for the insureds, then filed the actions below, seeking to recoup the payments from the defendant automobile manufacturer to the insureds on a theory of products liability. The trial court dismissed the actions, holding that the economic loss doctrine precluded recovery in tort, because the product damaged only itself in each case. The plaintiff insurance company now appeals. The appeals were consolidated for purposes of our review. We affirm the trial court in all respects, finding that the economic loss doctrine precludes recovery in these cases.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Julian P. Guinn
Carroll County Court of Appeals 09/17/01
Eddie McPeak vs. Mufflers Inc.

W2001-00471-COA-R3-CV
This appeal concerns the proper amount of damages due to the Plaintiff after the Defendant damaged the engine in the Plaintiff's 1970 Dodge Challenger. Three witnesses provided testimony on the proper amount of damages that should be awarded to the Plaintiff. The trial court utilized the testimony of the Defendant's expert witness in assessing damages. The Plaintiff appeals the trial court's judgment, asserting that the Defendant's witness relied on untrustworthy information in forming his expert opinion. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Roger A. Page
Madison County Court of Appeals 09/17/01
Health Cost Controls vs. Ronald Gifford

W2001-02267-COA-RM-CV
This is an insurance case on remand from the Tennessee Supreme Court. The Court has directed us "to reconsider the case on its merits in accordance with . . . York v. Sevier County Ambulance Auth., 8 S.W.3d 616 (Tenn. 1999)," which was decided after the appellate briefs were filed in the initial appeal. In York, the Supreme Court established that the "made whole" doctrine, applicable in cases involving an insurer's subrogation rights, is also applicable in cases involving an insurer's right to reimbursement for amounts paid to the insured from another source. After careful consideration, we find that York does not affect our original disposition of this case, and, therefore, on remand, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:W. Michael Maloan
Weakley County Court of Appeals 09/17/01
Wright Medical Tech. vs. Bernard Grisoni & Biogeneration Inc.

W2000-01302-COA-R7-CV
This case involves the alleged use of confidential information by an ex-employee. The defendant employee worked for the plaintiff employer developing a medical product. The employee signed an agreement prohibiting the use of confidential information after his employment ended, but did not sign a non-competition agreement. The employee was terminated and thereafter began manufacturing a competing medical product. The plaintiff employer sued and obtained a temporary injunction prohibiting the ex-employee from manufacturing the product. The trial court later dissolved the injunction. Subsequently, it found the defendant employer liable for malicious prosecution and punitive damages, awarding damages of over $9 million. The employer appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part and modify. We reverse the finding of malicious prosecution, holding that the evidence is insufficient to establish malice or lack of probable cause. We also reverse the award of punitive damages. We affirm the trial court's dissolution of the injunction against the former employee, and find that the compensatory damages are limited by the amount of the injunction bond. Consequently, the award of compensatory damages is modified to this amount.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans
Shelby County Court of Appeals 09/17/01
Elvis Wayne Ivey v. Long Hollow Leasing, Inc.,

M2000-02112-WC-R3-CV
In this appeal, the defendant-employer contends the trial court abused its discretion by (1) awarding the plaintiff-employee a default judgment after the defendant failed to obey an order compelling discovery, and by (2) denying its motion for a new trial. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr. Sp. J.
Originating Judge:J. O. Bond, Judge
Wayne County Workers Compensation Panel 09/17/01
Donna Harris vs. Rulon Harris/Paige Williams vs. F. Beach Jr.

W2001-00502-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a realtor's commission for a failed sale of real property that was jointly owned by parties to a divorce. Upon the divorce of the property owners, the court ordered that their residence be sold. Having a listing agreement with a realtor in place, a contract for the purchase of the property was signed. After difficulty consummating the sale, the realtor and the purchaser intervened in the divorce and were granted specific performance of the contract. The court's order set a closing date and an alternative divestiture closing date in case the parties again refused to cooperate. As contemplated by the court, the divorcing property owners failed to attend the closing and a date for the divestiture closing was set. A foreclosure was to occur, however, before the divestiture closing. One hour before the foreclosure, the purchaser under the contract acquired the note and allowed the foreclosure to proceed. The purchaser then acquired the remaining interest in the property at the foreclosure. The chancery court ordered the purchaser to pay to the realtor a commission on the amount paid for the note. The purchaser appealed, and for the following reasons, we reverse.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans
Shelby County Court of Appeals 09/17/01
State of Tennessee v. Marcus J. Turco - Concurring

W2001-01085-CCA-R3-CD

I join with the majority in concluding that the trial court was without authority to modify the defendant’s sentence after the sentence had expired. I write separately because I also find that the trial court was without authority to grant judicial diversion in this case even if the sentence had not expired. Absent appropriate legislation, the trial court is without authority to invent its own sentencing programs.

Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Judge John P. Colton, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/14/01
State of Tennessee v. Jon Robert Goodale

M2000-02140-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, Jon Goodale, was convicted of first degree premeditated murder, felony murder, and especially aggravated robbery in the Criminal Court of Davidson County. The first conviction was merged into the felony murder conviction and the defendant was sentenced to life. The trial court then conducted a sentencing hearing and imposed a twenty-five year sentence for the especially aggravated robbery to be served consecutive to the life sentence. In his appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 3(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, the defendant argues that (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions, (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury concerning accessory after the fact as a lesser-included offense to all charges, and (3) the sentence imposed by the trial court is excessive. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge Cheryl A. Blackburn
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/14/01
State of Tennessee v. Adrian S. Lennox

M2000-02869-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, Adrian S. Lennox, was convicted by a jury of aggravated burglary, vandalism, felony evading arrest and driving on a revoked license. The defendant was then sentenced as a Range II offender to nine years on the aggravated burglary conviction, three years on the vandalism conviction, five years on the felony evading arrest conviction, and six months on the conviction for driving on a revoked license. The trial court ordered that the aggravated burglary and the felony evading sentences run consecutively. On appeal, the defendant argues that (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the defendant's convictions, (2) the trial court improperly denied the defendant's motion for the preparation of trial transcripts prior to his motion for new trial hearing, and (3) the trial court improperly sentenced the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge Steve R. Dozier
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/14/01
State of Tennessee v. Paul H. Clever

W2000-01810-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant pled guilty to driving under the influence and was sentenced as a multiple offender. In this appeal as of right, the defendant alleges that (1) the trial court erred in finding that he was a third offender for purposes of sentencing, and (2) the DUI sentencing statute is unconstitutional because it is vague and has an ex post facto effect. After careful review, we affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence.

Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge James C. Beasley, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/14/01
State of Tennessee v. Doney D. Miles

W2000-02587-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery and sentence of eight years and six months, arguing: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the trial court erred in allowing hearsay into evidence under the excited utterance exception; (3) the trial court erroneously failed to charge the jury on lesser-included offenses; and (4) his sentence is excessive. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Judge Chris B. Craft
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/14/01
Karl Hamilton, a.k.a. R. Prewitt v. State of Tennessee

W2000-02240-CCA-R3-PC

Petitioner appeals the order of the Shelby County Criminal Court dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court held that the petition was time-barred by the statute of limitations. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the petition was filed timely, and reverse the decision of the post-conviction court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Judge Carolyn Wade Blackett
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/14/01