Doug Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, et al. - Concurring/Dissenting

Case Number
E2006-00903-SC-R11-CV

I fully concur in the majority’s conclusion that Alcoa owed a duty to Ms. Satterfield to take reasonable steps to prevent her from suffering harm as a result of the risks created by the operation of Alcoa’s facility. I write separately to express my belief that any discussion of foreseeability in the context of duty encroaches upon the role of the finder of fact. In doing so, I will explain the considerations that I believe are relevant to a duty analysis. This Court has previously stated that the existence of a duty depends upon the presence

Authoring Judge
Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge
Judge W. Dale Young
Case Name
Doug Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, et al. - Concurring/Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version