State of Tennessee v. Steve M. Jarman - concurring Opinion

Case Number
M2017-01313-CCA-R3-CD

I join in the majority's disposition of this case. I write separately because it is my view that the references to passion and provocation by their very nature express neither elements of voluntary manslaughter that the State is required to prove nor an absolute defense; instead, they are a type of built-in mitigation to a knowing or intentional killing.

Authoring Judge
Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Larry J. Wallace
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Steve M. Jarman - concurring Opinion
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version