Larry Wade v. State of Tennessee - concurring in part and dissenting in part

Case Number
E2017-02177-CCA-R3-PC

I join the majority in affirming the post-conviction court’s denial of the petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief. However, I write separately to dissent from the majority’s holding that a hearing on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, which a defendant files after sentencing but before the judgment becomes final, does not constitute a “critical stage” of the proceedings and, therefore, does not provide the constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel.

Authoring Judge
Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge
Judge Thomas C. Greenholtz
Case Name
Larry Wade v. State of Tennessee - concurring in part and dissenting in part
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version