In Re Estate of John E. Mayfield - Dissenting

Case Number
M2018-01977-COA-R3-CV

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reversal of the Trial Court’s order dismissing Mr. Saltsman’s claim. I instead would affirm the dismissal because Mr. Mayfield informed Mr. Saltsman before Mr. Saltsman ever even saw it that the Commercial Purchase and Sale Agreement (“the Purported Instrument”) was invalid and, as the majority states, “had to be rewritten . . .”, and Mr. Saltsman acknowledged and agreed to that.

Authoring Judge
Chief Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge
Judge Suzanne Lockert-Mash
Case Name
In Re Estate of John E. Mayfield - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version