logo

Workers' Compensation Opinions - 4th Quarter 2004

The following Opinions are available for download:


Cases posted the week of 12/27/2004
Earl Mullins v. Quebecor World - E2004-01241-WC-R3-CV View
Hawkins County - The trial court awarded the employee 26 percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The employee has appealed insisting the award is not adequate. The judgment is affirmed.

Velma Keller v. Snap-On - E2003-02379-WC-R3-CV View
Washington County - This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court awarded the employee 50 percent permanent partial disability to her left arm and 60 percent permanent partial disability to her right arm as a result of carpal tunnel syndrome injuries. Employer contends the awards are excessive. The judgment is affirmed.


Cases posted the week of 12/06/2004
Timothy Harrison v. Peterbilt Motors - M2003-01457-WC-R3-CV View
Robertson County - In this appeal, the employee was on lay-off status at the time of the initial award of 50% vocational disability (2 ½ times the medical impairment rating). The employee filed a complaint for reconsideration shortly after he participated in a walk-through at the plant and after which the employer found that there were no jobs available within the employee's medical restrictions. The employee contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint for reconsideration of an original award which he contends was granted under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-241(a)(1) and that, because his employer retains him on lay-off status but has not returned him to work, he is now eligible for reconsideration under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-241(a)(2). The trial court dismissed the complaint finding the facts not sufficient to institute a new cause of action under the statute. The panel concluded that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Brenda McIlroy v. Medical Specialty Clinic - W2003-02910-WC-R3-CV View
Madison County - In this appeal, the employer insists the trial court's award of disability benefits based on 24 percent to the body as a whole is excessive under the circumstances. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the evidence fails to preponderate against the findings of the trial court.

Michael Britton v. Emerson Electric - W2004-00396-WC-R3-CV View
Crockett County - In this appeal, the employer insists the award of permanent partial disability benefits based on 25 percent to the hand should be modified to one based on 50 percent to the finger. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the award should be modified to one based on 80 percent to the third finger.


Cases posted the week of 11/29/2004
David Stupp v. Phillips Auto Body - W2003-00285-SC-WCM-CV View
Shelby County - The trial court determined that the plaintiff sustained a 25% vocational impairment to the body as a whole. The defendant asserts that: 1) the plaintiff failed to carry his burden of proof of permanent injury; 2) the trial court erred in finding plaintiff had an operative disk lesion which necessitated surgery; 3) the trial court erred in not granting defendant's motion for additional facts or to amend judgement; and 4) the trial court erred in finding that Dr. Anthony Segal's charges were reasonable and necessary and in granting plaintiff's motion for discretionary costs. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred when it awarded plaintiff a 25% disability impairment to the body as a whole, urging that the award should have been higher. We agree with the position of the plaintiff, and for the reasons set forth below, we modify the judgment of the trial court to award a forty-five percent (45%) vocational disability to the body as a whole.


Cases posted the week of 11/15/2004
Larry Thrasher v. Carrier Corporation - M2003-01217-WC-R3-CV View
Coffee County - This case, submitted on briefs, is before the Panel for a second time. In the first appeal filed by the employer, this Panel reduced the trial court's award of 100% permanent partial disability for work-related injuries to the employee's "two feet" to 40% permanent partial disability to "each foot." The employer brings a second appeal contending that the trial court erred in interpreting the Panel's judgment modifying the award. The employee contends that this is both a frivolous appeal and a bad-faith effort to avoid paying the employee his workers' compensation benefits. The Panel has concluded that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


Cases posted the week of 11/08/2004
William G. Norvell v. Menlo Logistics - W2004-00373-SC-WCM-CV View
Tipton County - In this appeal, the employee insists the trial court erred in finding that his back injury was not causally related to an accidental injury occurring at work on October 4, 1999. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded for an award of benefits.


Cases posted the week of 10/18/2004
Judy Todd v. Continental Casualty -W2003-01019-WC-R3-CV View
Gibson County - The trial court determined that the plaintiff suffered a 69% vocational impairment to the body as a whole. The defendant insurer asserts that: 1) that the plaintiff had a meaningful return to work and that the 2.5 times caps should apply; and 2) that if the caps do not apply, the award was excessive and not supported by the evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgement of the trial court.


Cases posted the week of 10/11/2004
Janet Simpson v. Donaldson Co. - E2003-02347-WC-R3-CV View
Greene County - The trial court dismissed the claim finding the employee’s condition did not arise out of her employment. Plaintiff appeals and argues the evidence preponderates against the conclusion of the trial court. Judgment affirmed.

Lori Ann Johnson v. McKee Foods - E2003-02899-WC-R3-CV View
Hamilton County - The trial court dismissed the claim holding it was barred by the expiration of the one year statute of limitations. The judgment is reversed as an issue of fact exists as to whether the statute of limitations should be suspended until the employee learned of her disability from her doctor.

Clyde Bishop v. Earthgrains Baking - E2003-02714-WC-R3-CV View
McMinn County - The Plaintiff claimed to have suffered a compensable back injury. The evidence revealed that he had a congenital back condition which was not aggravated by the claimed injury, and his suit was dismissed. The judgment of dismissal is affirmed. The trial judge disallowed discretionary costs because to allow such costs would deter the filing of workers’ compensation cases. On the issue of discretionary costs we reverse and remand for a determination and award of discretionary costs.

Ellis L. Woods v. Lockheed Martin Energy - E2003-01789-WC-R3-CV View
Morgan County - The Plaintiff sustained a gradual hearing loss while working for successive employers performing essentially the same duties. The trial judge held that the last-injurious employment rule applied. We affirm.

Danny Capps v. Anvil International - W2003-01414-SC-WCM-CV View
Chester County - The trial court found that employee suffered a permanent partial disability of 15% to the right arm. We affirm.

Donna Payton v. McKenzie Valve & Machining - W2003-02094-WC-R3-CV View
Carroll County - In this appeal, Employer argues: (i) that the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of one of Employee's witnesses; (ii) that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's finding that Employee's injury was caused by her employment; and (iii) that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's award of 37.5% permanent partial disability to each arm. We conclude that the evidence fails to preponderate against the trial court's decision to allow the testimony of Employee's witness, the trial court's finding that Employee's injury was caused by her employment, and the trial court's award of 37.5% permanent partial disability to each arm. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Shirley Moore v. Best Metal Cabinets - W2003-00687-WC-R3-CV View
Haywood County - In this appeal, the Employer argues that the trial court erred in awarding permanent disability benefits to the Employee, in failing to apply the 2.5 cap pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-241(a), and in failing to make specific findings of fact pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-241(c). We conclude that the evidence preponderates in favor of the trial court's award of permanent disability benefit; that the evidence fails to preponderate against the trial court's award of benefits that exceed the 2.5 cap; and that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's award of six times the anatomic impairment rating. We, therefore, affirm the trial court's judgment, as modified.

Bernard Falcicchio v. Gibson Mechanical Contractors - W2003-02078-WC-R3-CV View
Shelby County - In this appeal, Employee argues that the trial court erred in granting the motion to dismiss filed by Gibson Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and Amerisure Insurance Company. We conclude that the trial court erred granting the motion to dismiss and reverse the judgment of the trial court.